My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7046 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7046 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:16:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7046
Author
Valdez, R. A., W. J. Masslich and A. Wasowicz.
Title
Final Report\
USFW Year
1992.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />successful spawning and rearing for these species. High numbers of YOY red shiners, sand shiners <br />and fathead minnows were also captured, particularly during 1990. High numbers of these species <br />in 1990 may be a result of favorable spawning and rearing conditions created by consistent low flows <br />that year. <br /> <br />Native species were prominent in the middle reaches of the study area (Figure 3). Non-native <br />species may be more common in the lower reaches because of the Colorado River and in the upper <br />reaches because of McPhee Dam. Influxes of non-native species from the Colorado River probably <br />shifted species composition in the lower reaches. In the upper reaches, habitat changes associated <br />with the operation of McPhee Dam may have altered species composition. Stocking and management <br />of non-native salmonid fishes below McPhee have also affected species composition in the upper <br />reaches. <br /> <br />Each of the four major native species exhibited a unique distnbution through the study area as <br />a percentage of total species composition. Flannelmouth suckers were the most ubiquitous native <br />species in the drainage, although these were most prevalent in the middle reaches (Figure 4) <br />Bluehead suckers comprised a higher percentage in the lower reaches, but was common throughout <br />the study area (Figure 5). Roundtail chubs were most prevalent in the upper reaches (Figure 6), and <br />percentage of speckled dace was also higher in the upper reaches (Figure 7). <br /> <br />Analyses of seine samples also indicate that natives were more prevalent in the middle and upper <br />of the study area (Figure 8). The relatively high percent composition in Reach 3 during 1991, was <br />difficult to explain. A series of flood events that occurred in 1991 may have reduced the abundance <br />of non-native species in this reach. It is possible that increased composition of native species may <br />be representative of strong year classes of one or more of the native species, however this was not <br />reflected in catch rates for 1991. <br /> <br />During Trip 4, 1991, a Roy-tagged flannelmouth sucker was recaptured at RM 528. The fish was <br />originally handled by the Service on May 14, 1981 at RM 39.5 (Valdez et al. 1982), measuring 474 <br />mm total length (TL) and weighing 1120 gms. The fish was recaptured on April 6, 1991, 13 miles <br />upstream measuring 512 mm TL and weighing 993 gms. During a period of approximately 9 years <br />and 11 months the fish grew 38 rom and lost 127 gms. This translates to a growth rate of 3.8 <br />mm/year. The weight loss can be attributed to numerous factors (i.e. condition, observer error, etc.). <br /> <br />4.2 Summary of Fish Collections by Gear Type with CPE Statistics <br /> <br />Results of fish sampling efforts for each gear type are presented in the following sections (Table <br />2). <br /> <br />4.2.1 Electrolishing <br /> <br />Flannelmouth sucker, roundtail chub, bluehead sucker, carp and channel catfish were the most <br />abundant species in the catch using canoe electrofishing during both years of the study (Table 7). <br />Differences in catch-per-effort (CPE) between the 2 years were difficult to interpret but were <br />probably associated with <br />one or more factors including: 1) actual changes in density; 2) different conditions (i.e. flow, water <br />quality) between trips and years; 3) differences in timing of sampling between the 2 years of study. <br /> <br />Highest catch rates for canoe electrofishing (Table 7) were for flannelmouth sucker (105.7 fish/10 <br />hours), roundtail chub (52.8), bluehead sucker (30.0) and carp (29.0). Highest catch rates for Jon <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.