My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8025
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8025
Author
Valdez, R., et al.
Title
Colorado River Fishery Project, Tributary Report (Gunnison and Dolores River) Final Report.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />23 <br /> <br />The total CPE was 75.0 fish/10 hr using hour gear (Table 7). This <br />seemingly high value is deceptive, because it is based on a small amount <br />of effort (1.2 hr). No fishes were collected 1n stratum W using <br />area-based gear. <br /> <br />Flows in the Dolores River were more dramatically reduced by <br />withdrawals than those in the Gunnison River. In 1981 (except for the <br />runoff period--April to mid-July) the Dolores River usually flowed at <br />less than 500 cfs (Figure 4). CPE values viewed over months in which <br />sampling occurred illustrated some significant changes in fish abundance <br />with corresponding changes in flow (Table 8 and 9). A similar movement <br />of juvenile and adult native and endemic fishes was seen from May to <br />August (Figure 7). Bluehead sucker, flannelmouth sucker and roundtail <br />chub increased in abundance from early May to mid-May, corresponding with <br />runoff. TIlese species then gradually decreased in abundance from mid-May <br />to August, when few natives or endemics were found in the Dolores River <br />at low flow. TIle Dolores River had little surface water flow after late <br />August 1981, and a few remaining pools harbored large numbers of <br />non-native fishes and few natives. <br /> <br />Species Composition by Habitat <br /> <br />Gunnison River <br /> <br />Backwaters. Backwaters, although few in number, appeared to be an <br />important habitat in the Gunnison River. TIlirteen species (nine <br />non-native, two endemic and two native) were collected from Gunnison <br />River backwaters. Backwaters were more attractive for non-native species <br />than any of the other habitat types. Over half (51.3%) of the total <br />catch in backwaters was composed of non-native fishes. Sand shiner <br />(21.2%), fathead minnow (20.8%) and bluehead sucker (15.3%) were the most <br />abundant species in backwaters. <br /> <br />CPE values (area and hour-based gears) for each species in each <br />habitat are shown in Tables 10 and 11. CPE comparisons suggest that <br />backwaters were less important for larger fishes, as indicated by <br />_relatively small catch values for hour-based gears. TIle total hour CPE <br />was 3.24 fish/lO hr, less than all other habitats sampled. Backwaters <br />were apparently more important areas for smaller fishes, as total area <br />CPE was 15.24 fish/10m2. Only side channels and eddies had higher <br />total area CPE values. <br /> <br />Eddies. Nine species (five non-native, two endemic, and two native) <br />were found in eddies in the Gunnison River. Endemics comprised 87.1% of <br />the total catch. Roundtail chub were the most abundant species caught in <br />eddies (76.7%), followed by flannelmouth sucker (10.4%) and bluehead <br />sucker (9.0%). Fathead minnow and sand shiner were the most common <br />non-native species, accounting for 2.5% and 1.37., respectively. <br /> <br />Based on relatively high CPE values for area-based gears, it appears <br />that eddies were important for small fishes in the Gunnison River. Total <br />area CPE was 30.42 fish/10m2, highest for all habitat types sampled <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.