Laserfiche WebLink
<br />appears to be an important factor in maintenance of nursery backwaters in winter. Kaeding et al. <br />( 1985) hypothesized that high early-life mortality might be an important factor limiting Colorado <br />pikeminnow populations in the upper basin. <br /> <br />Hypothesis 4: Backwater Depth <br /> <br />The significant relationship (r=0.74, P=0.0417) between greater average backwater depth <br />and lower overwinter decrease in density of age-O Colorado pikeminnow strongly suggests higher <br />survival by fish in the deeper, more persistent backwaters. Deeper backwaters are less likely to <br />become flooded or desiccated with changes in river stage, and hence, tend to be more persistent in <br />winter. This persistent habitat enables the young fish to limit unnecessary movements during the <br />\vi nter low metabolic period, and to remain in a sheltered, food-rich environment. Antecedent flows <br />that shape deep backwater channels are desirable for enhancing this geomorphic feature in nursery <br />backwaters. <br /> <br />H,Jpothesis 5: Densities of Non-Native Fishes <br /> <br />The hypothesis that overwinter survival is significantly higher at low fall densities of non- <br />native fish in nursery backwaters was not accepted. The data fit the linear model poorly, and analysis <br />showed that the slope of the relationship was approximately equal to zero. Perhaps predation and <br />competition forces are not as intense during winter as in other times of the year, or these interactions <br />are occurring outside of backwaters as young pikeminnow are forced to seek alternative habitats. <br />Moreover, other factors may be having a more important impact on age-O Colorado pikeminnow in <br />winter than non-native fishes. <br /> <br />Reliability of Catch Rate Data <br /> <br />Regression analyses showed poor relationships between overwinter survival of age-O <br />Colorado pikeminnow and fall total length, flow variability, river temperature, and non-native fish <br />densities. Possibly interactions among these and other variables would explain measured decreases <br />in age-O fish densities from fall to spring. Alternatively, catch rates of age-O Colorado pikeminnow <br />may be insufficiently sensitivity to accurately assess real changes in fish density. Haines and Modde <br />( 1996) suggested that survival estimates of age-O Colorado pikeminnow from mark-recapture data <br />were more accurate and precise than those from catch-per-unit-effort data. For the 1992 year class, <br />they showed overwinter survival of 45% from mark-recapture estimates in Reach 4, compared to <br />38% decreases in catch rate for this study. For the study period (1987-95) for Reach 3, we found a <br />mean survival index of 54% (range, 23-100%), while Haines et al. (1998) reported a mean <br />overwinter survival of 45% (6-62%), using mark-recapture methods. Some individual comparisons <br />and mean comparisons are strikingly similar, indicating that both catch rate and mark-recpature <br />techniques may provide reasonable indices of overwinter survival. Additional comparisons of mark- <br />recapture and catch rate data are needed to determine the best and most cost-effective technique for <br />esti mating overwinter survival. <br /> <br />19 <br />