Laserfiche WebLink
<br />levels, and land may not be developed for housing so that habitat for plant species is <br />preserved. However, by not harvesting trees or building houses, recreational uses may be <br />enhanced and setting aside minimum stream flows in one area may imply that more water is <br />available for development elsewhere. Assessing the economic impacts of designating critical <br />habitat thus requires a general equilibrium analysis to fully capture the range of potential <br />activities created by the designation as well as the range of activities that are eliminated or <br />reduced. In short, the reallocation will yield economic impacts that are benefits as well as <br />costs . <br /> <br />This paper reports the methodology and results from a study that measured the economic <br />impacts of designating critical habitat for four endangered fishes along a 2,200 mile stretch of <br />the Colon.do River and its major tributaries. A second case study covering two fishes and 160 <br />miles of the Virgin River in Nevada and Utah is also discussed. The two case studies analyze <br />the impacts of critical habitat designation on two regions greatly differing in size. For the <br />Colorado study, designation affects all seven states in the Colorado river basin: Arizona, <br />California, Colorado. Nevada, New Mexico. Utah and Wyoming. The critical habitat analyzed in <br />the Virgin study covers a river flowing through three counties in Arizona, Nevada, and Utah. In <br />both cases, the study region was determined on the basis of habitat needs and direct economic <br />impacts. <br /> <br />Two study regions differ considerably in the sizes of their economies. The output of the region <br />in the Colorado study is approximately $1.3 trillion annually, compared to $28 billion for the <br />Virgin study region. The Colorado study region constitutes a diversified economy that has <br />experienced growth above the national average during the last several decades. The region of the <br />Virgin study is currently one of the fastest growing areas in the United States, with continued <br />high population growth rates projected for the time horizon of the study. The time horizons of <br />the studies coincide with the time span of the proposed recovery plans for the species: 1995 to <br />2020 in the Colorado study, and 1995 to 2040 in the Virgin study. The major characteristics of <br />the two studies are summarized in Table 1. <br /> <br />,I <br /> <br />4 <br />