My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9391
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9391
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:15:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9391
Author
Watts, G., W. R. Noonan, H. R. Maddux and D. S. Brookshire.
Title
The Endangered Species Act and Critical Habitat Designation
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
An Integrated Biological and Economic Approach.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the region. The sub-regional impacts are detennined for two counties: Clark County, Nevada <br />and Washington County, Utah. The impacts in Clark County include those to the small section <br />of Mohave County, Arizona, that is included in the study region. As no direct impacts accrue to <br />Iron County, Utah, no separate county-level impacts are calculated. Under the construction <br />scenario, the net present value (NPV) of output losses in Clark County is -$10.6 million, a <br />deviation of -0.0000 1 percent from the baseline. For Washington county, impacts under the <br />construction scenario are slightly larger, but still small. The NPV of lost output is -$47.5 <br />million, a reduction in economic activity by -0.0016 percent from the baseline. <br /> <br />TABLE 3 <br />Virgin River Direct and Indirect Regional Impacts of Critical Habitat Designation <br /> <br />Output Changes Percentage <br />NPV @ 3% Deviations <br />(1990$ Millions) from Baseline <br /> <br />Sub-regional Results <br /> <br />Construction Scenario I <br /> <br />Washington County <br />Clark County <br /> <br />-47.5 <br />-10.6 <br /> <br />-0.0016 <br /> <br />-0.00001 <br /> <br />Conservation Scenari02 <br /> <br />Washington County <br /> <br />- 1 3.7 <br /> <br />-0.00046 <br /> <br />Construction Scenario <br />Conservation Scenario <br /> <br />Regional Results <br />-59.8 <br />-20.9 <br /> <br />-0.0001 <br /> <br />-0.0000 <br /> <br />Notes: <br />1. The Construction Scenario (Sn for the Virgin Study meets the increased needs on behalf of the endangered <br />fishes by accelerating the construction of reservoirs and acce lerated retirement of agricu ltural land. <br />2. The Conservation Scenario (CO) for the Virgin Study meets the increased water demands primarily by reducing <br />per capita consumption through investment in water conservation measures, e.g., low-flow shower heads, <br />xeriscaping, etc. for residential and commercial buildings. <br /> <br />Under the conservation scenario, no direct impacts accrue to Clark County. Thus, only impacts <br />in Washington County are presented. Implementing the conservation scenario will reduce the <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.