Laserfiche WebLink
<br />from salinity levels. The resulting direct economic impacts fall largely on the agricultural <br />sector. However, there is an additional category of impact that arises in this case. Several <br />water delivery projects are planned for the next 45 years to cope with regional population <br />growth. Critical habitat designations will necessitate that these projects be constructed earlier <br />with a consequent increase in the cost of water delivery and this will have the effect of <br />reducing household and fIrm budgets for other expenditures. Alternatively, conservation <br />actions will be required which will also raise costs to water users in the form of additional <br />investments in conservation actions. 5 <br /> <br />IV. Regional Impact Modelingli <br /> <br />Two classes of applied general equilibrium models were developed for the analysis of the <br />economic impacts associated with the protection and recovery of endangered species in the <br />Colorado study. The first class consists of a set of conventional Input-Output (1-0) models of the <br />entire region and of the sub-regional units (e.g., one for each of the seven states). The second <br />class is a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model of the entire region. For the Virgin <br />River study, separate 1-0 models for each of the two impacted counties and a regional model for <br />all three counties were developed. <br /> <br />The 1-0 and CGE analyses enable the determination of a variety of impact measures. Impacts <br />are measured as changes in output. The two model classes measure impacts at three levels: the <br />sub-regional level, the regional level, and the national level. Depending on the case study, the <br /> <br />5 Per capita water use in the St. George, UT area is considerably greater than in other southwest urban <br />areas. Current use in 465 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). For the conservation scenario this was reduced to <br />approximately 260 gpcd which is comparable to Phoenix and well above Tucson, AZ which has a use rate of 160 <br />gpcd. Conservation requires expenditures which raises the effective cost of water and this was incorporated into <br />the scenario. <br /> <br />6 The detailed accounts of the modeling are found in Brookshire, McKee, and Watts (1993), Brookshire, <br />McKee, and Watts (1994), and Brookshire, McKee, and Schmidt(1995). This section draws upon and is taken in <br />part from chapters 7, 8, and 15 (section K) of Brookshire et al. (1993) and was utilized in Brookshire et al. (1994, <br />1995). <br /> <br />13 <br />