Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />*L. WARD BANNISTER, <br />DENVER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, 1922: <br /> <br />SYMPOSIUM <br />PROCEEDINGS <br />MAY 1997 <br /> <br />It may have occurred to some of you that Rita <br />Sudman has enormous powers of persuasion - so <br />strong, in fact, that she might even be able to bring <br />back the dead. I'm living proof. It has been a long <br />journey to get here. I'm glad to be here. It's an honor <br />to be here. And I want especially to say to you that I <br />recognize that you are a very diverse group, that you <br />have different views about the Colorado Compact <br />and Delph Carpenter. Some of you probably look at <br />it as a godsend, others perhaps as a curse. <br />What I want you to understand, as something of <br />a caveat to what I have to say to you this morning, is <br />that with very few exceptions - but there were <br />exceptions in all of the states - the majority of people <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />in 1922 looked at the accomplishment here in <br />Santa Fe as an enormously successful one, and I want <br />to urge you to understand that what I say to you is <br />being said in that context. <br />I also wanted to say that, having been a participant <br />with Mr. Carpenter in the negotiations, in many of <br />the deliberations informally that had to do with the <br />Compact, thar there were very few comments <br />exchanged amongst the commissioners or others, for <br />that matter, that had to do with the Native Ameri- <br />cans. It was a foregone conclusion on the part of all <br />of us that the federal government would have to <br />continue its responsibility to the Native Americans <br />regardless of whether or not we, the commissioners, <br />were able to put together a compact. So what I have <br />to say today does not reflect the great needs and <br />interests that you all now understand in regard to the <br />Native American tribes. But again, I ask you to think <br />in terms of the times that we are dealing with. <br />Nearly 75 years ago, I joined the representatives of <br />the seven Colorado River Basin states, their advisors <br />and Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover to <br />negotiate the Colorado River Compact in this <br />building. We met then in the lodge's bridal suite. <br />Compared to the married honeymooners who had <br />previously consummated their vows in that room, the <br />commissioners and their entourage had somewhat <br />different expectations from each other. Instead of <br />celebrating a marriage already performed in the <br />public eye, we were hoping to achieve a kind of <br />prenuptial agreement mitigating against future <br />conflict. <br />While possibly less amorous, intimate and <br />sentimental than the newlyweds, these men were <br />equally passionate and equally committed to the <br />consummation of their own goal. As with the <br />Colorado River itself, I can assure you that <br />discussions were often swift and direct at points, <br />sometimes tortuous and meandering, always <br />potentially dangerous. <br />All of us had a sense of history in the making as <br />we sat here. And we hoped fervently that the knot <br />that we were going to tie in the Palace of the <br />Governors on Nov. 24, 1922, would be acceptable <br />to Congress and would allow an agreement between <br />seven disparate states to endure for many years to <br />come. All of us believed that the Colorado River <br />carried sufficient water for the present and future <br />needs of the seven states and Mexico. Data from the <br />experts were convincing. We were wrong. <br />Even with the population growth we had seen in <br />California, which from 1900 to 1920 had increased <br /> <br />