Laserfiche WebLink
<br />basin, that there is a question as to whether these <br />reservoirs are going to fluctuate the way that the <br />original negotiators perhaps contemplated that they <br />would fluctuate. They were right in the middle of the <br />reclamation era, the dawn of the great projects that <br />were developed in the Colorado River Basin and they <br />were still in the view of settling the West. Their water <br />needs were based on all this irrigation that would be <br />created as a result of these projects. The reality in the <br />future clearly will be something different. <br />What we now face, of course, is a situation in <br />which the Lower Basin has reached its limit in its use <br />of water out of the main stem. We would argue that <br />it has exceeded its limit out of the tributaries, but <br />that's a different issue. And the Upper Basin has the <br />real concern that we had in 1922 - that over-use will <br />ripen into an entitlement to excess water - so we are <br />putring off that day of reckoning about when we <br />ultimately have to meet a delivery obligation and are <br />concentrating our efforts on asserting our perpetual <br />rights under the Compact and the limitations that <br />the Lower Basin has. <br /> <br /> <br />STATES' <br />PERSPECTIVES <br /> <br />QUESTION FROM TIlE AUDIENCE: Do you <br />see the federal government, in order to consolidate <br />our friendship with Mexico, allowing the Colorado <br />River to drain into the Gulf! <br /> <br />Muvs: I think that's another panel. But I know <br />California is concerned about the implications of the <br />Department of State trying to sweeten up negotia- <br />tions on other issues with water. That's a perennial <br />problem. . <br /> <br />SYMPOSIUM <br />PROCEEDINGS <br />MAy 1997 <br /> <br />o <br />