Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Figure 5. The marsh at Cardenas Creek (mile 70.9-L) (continued). <br /> <br />B. February 26, 1993. Marshes, prime riparian habitat in Grand Canyon and elsewhere, pro.vide habitat to <br />native fishes and wildlife, particularly birds. Young native fish use the backwaters as protection ~rom p~edators, <br />and birds frequently nest in the dense vegetation. The marsh at Cardena~ Creek, for example, IS nestmg . <br />habitat for southwestern willow fly catchers, which is an endangered species. But mar~hes were n.ot p.resent In <br />1890; they exist solely because of the flood control by Glen Canyon Dam. M~st of the. Increased np~nan <br />vegetation in the view is tamarisk, although willow, arrowweed, and other native species also have Increased <br /> <br />(Tom Wise, Stake 1440). <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Lava Falls Rapid (mile 179) and Three Springs Canyon <br />(mile 215.7-L) - were observed by Clover and Jotter <br />(1944), who collected plant specimens from these sites. <br />In the 1950s, Reilly observed that the marsh in the <br />mouth of Three Springs Canyon had a patch of cane <br />100 feet across; it also contained willows, tamarisk, <br />and cattails. Riparian vegetation surrounding the <br />springs at Deer Creek Falls (mile 136.3-R), Vaseys <br />Paradise (mile 31.8-R), and on the right side of Hance <br />Rapid (mile 76.7-R) shows prominently in historic <br />photographs. Rigg and Nichols stopped at Cardenas <br />Creek (mile 70.9-L) before Glen Canyon Dam and <br />agreed that the area now supporting a marsh was sand <br />and rocks. Reilly saw willows at Cardenas Creek but <br />did not specifically mention tamarisk, which he saw <br />elsewhere. Cutter commented that the current large <br />amount of reeds along the river corridor did not <br />resemble anything she saw in 1938. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Desert Vegetation <br /> <br />Cutter thought the desert above the river <br />appeared greener in 1995, than in 1938. Both years had <br />relatively wet winters and normal summers. From <br />replication of the Stanton photographs from 1890, we <br />attribute the difference to a large increase in brittlebush <br />(Webb and Bowers, 1993). Jotter stated that she and <br />Clover would certainly have listed now-common <br />species such as snakeweed and tamarisk if they had <br />been present at any of their sampling locations. This <br />allows use of their plant lists (Clover and Jotter, 1944) <br />as a baseline for evaluating invasions or increases of <br />common species. At the site where the type specimen <br />of beavertail cactus (Opuntia basilaris var. <br />longiaureolata) was collected in 1938, we could find <br />nothing that matched the original plant, which has not <br />been recollected. We believe the variety they collected <br />may have been a hybrid. <br /> <br />SPECIFIC CHANGES OBSERVED IN GRAND CANYON 21 <br />