My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9390
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9390
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:12:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9390
Author
Webb, R. H., T. S. Melis and R. A. Valdez.
Title
Observations of Environmental Change in Grand Canyon, Arizona.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
02-4080,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Figure 2. Badger Creek Rapid (mile 8.0). <br /> <br />A. August 1964. In this view of Badger Creek Rapid from the left canyon rim, low water in the Colorado River <br />reveals many of the rocks that constrict the river. The sand bar on river right has significant sand and a few <br />scattered, non-native tamarisk trees (Tad Nichols, no number, courtesy of the photographer). <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />flows is generally greater than 80 percent. Debris flows <br />occur infrequently; only 60 percent of the tributaries in <br />Grand Canyon have produced debris flows in the last <br />century (Griffiths and others, 1996). Because they <br />transport large boulders, debris flows leave spectacular <br />evidence of their occurrence, and most observers of <br />these floods left a written record or had a vivid memory <br />of the event. In contrast, streamflow floods have a <br />sediment concentration of less than about 40 percent <br />and occur more often. Some observers (e.g., Reilly) <br />could distinguish the two types of floods. <br />The Old Timers remember few new debris-flow <br />deposits, and only a few debris flows are recorded in <br />diaries. We showed the Old Timers the 1994, Jackass <br />Creek (mile 7.9-L) debris-flow deposits at Badger <br />Creek Rapid (mile 8.0), and discussed this geomorphic <br />process with them extensively (Fig. 2). We then asked <br />them if they had seen any similar deposits along the <br />river during their river experiences. Rigg remembered <br />when the debris fan of Boucher Creek (mile 96.7-L) <br /> <br />changed radically in 1951 or 1952. When he first saw <br />it, mud was still oozing out from between the boulders. <br />Using Robert Brewster Stanton's photographs from <br />1890, we had identified the Boucher Creek debris flow <br />as one of the largest in the last century in Grand <br />Canyon but had not known the exact year it occurred <br />(Melis, 1997; Webb, 1996). <br />The highest frequency of debris flows in Grand <br />Canyon occurs at Lava Falls Rapid (mile 179) from <br />Prospect Canyon (mile 179.4-L; Webb and others, <br />1999b). In 1954, Georgie White arrived at Lava Falls <br />on July 24, and saw Prospect Creek (mile 179.4-L) <br />running at "full force." Large boulders were entering <br />the river in a manner White likened to a "big black lava <br />flow." White's observations are only the second <br />eyewitness account of a Grand Canyon debris flow, <br />after Robert Brewster Stanton's account of a debris <br />flow in South Canyon (mile 31.6-R; Smith and <br />Crampton, 1987). Jones remembered that the debris fan <br />of Prospect Canyon (mile 179.4-L) was paved with fine <br /> <br />SPECIFIC CHANGES OBSERVED IN GRAND CANYON 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.