Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Summary of Endangered Fish Captured <br /> <br />Colorado Squawfish <br /> <br />A total of 1016 Colorado squawfish were captured during the eight trips through <br />Cataract Canyon. Included were 2 adults, 69 juveniles (Table 19), 834 YOY, and <br />111 larvae (Table 20). All of the adults and juveniles were returned alive, as <br />well as all YOY that could be field identified. The remainder of the YOY and <br />all of the larvae were preserved and sent to the Larval Fish Laboratory for <br />identification. Of the 2235 specimens identified by the LFL, 279 were larvae <br />or YOY Colorado squawfish (Appendix C). The following is a breakdown by age <br />category of the squawfish handled and associated information. <br /> <br />Adults. Table 19 summarizes all of the adult (400 mm+ TL) Colorado squawfish <br />handled during the 1987 Cataract Canyon study. Only two adults were captured; <br />one in April at RM 16.2, near Indian Creek; and one in July at the confluence, <br />RM 216.3. Although sampling conditions were good during most of the eight <br />trips, no other adult squawfish were seen or captured. Four adults were <br />captured in 1985, and 5 were captured in 1986. <br /> <br />Juveniles. A total of 69 juvenile Colorado squawfish were handled during this <br />investigation. A list of these fish and associated information is presented in <br />Table 20. Although the usual length range for juveniles is 60-400 rom TL, some <br />of the juveniles (immature fish greater than one calendar year of age) were in <br />the 40 and 50 rom size range. The relatively small size for the 1986 year class <br />may be explained by their relatively late hatching dates. A further explana- <br />tion of this phenomenon is presented in the following section. <br /> <br />Young-Of-The-Year and Larvae. A total of 834 YOY and 111 larval (<60 rom TL) <br />Colorado squawfish were handled during this investigation. The YOY were <br />defined as those fish past their larval stage of development and less than one <br />calendar year of age. The larval fish are defined as described by Snyder <br />(1985). A list of the YOYand larvae with associated information are presented <br />in Table 20. To minimize mortality to these fish from handling, only some were <br />measured in the field. These lengths, along with those provided by the Larval <br />Fi sh Lab (LFL), from specimens sent for identification, are included in <br />Appendix B. The reports of the LFL are also included in Appendix C of this <br />report. <br /> <br />i. Distribution. The distribution of YOY squawfish is examined in the <br />Cataract Canyon study area for 1985, 1986, and 1987. Since the distribution of <br />these fish was not uniform and appeared to be influenced by habitat and the <br />geographical nature of the river, the area was stratified into four regions <br />(Figure 2): (1) Green River from Mineral Bottom to the confluence, RM 50.0- <br />0.0; (2) Colorado River from the confluence to the first rapid in Cataract, RM <br />216.5 - 212.5; (3) Colorado River in Cataract Canyon, RM 212.5 - 201.5; and <br />(4) Lake powell inflow from above Ten Cent Rapid to Palmer Canyon, RM 201.5- <br />195.0. In all three years examined, numbers of YOY captured by seining, <br />percentage of total catch, and CPE was highest in region 1, followed by regions <br />2, 3, and 4, in that order. CPE of YOY squawfish in region 1 in all three <br />years exceeds the minimum of 0.9 fish/lOm2, established to designate high- <br /> <br />17 <br />