My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3100
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
3100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:07:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
3100
Author
Valdez, R. A.
Title
Cataract Canyon Fish Study (Fisheries Biology and Rafting)
USFW Year
1985.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2-3 <br /> <br />2.3 River Flows <br /> <br />Estimated flows in Cataract Canyon during this investigation varied <br />from a high of 21,985 cfs on July 25 to a low of 6,330 cfs on August 26, <br />1985. Flow estimates were provided by USSR River Forecast Center in Sal t <br />Lake City, Utah. Each estimate is based on recorded flows at the Green <br />River gauge near Green River, Utah and the Cisco gauge on the Colorado River <br />near Cisco, Utah. Flows for each day and general river conditions for the 6 <br />trips are presented in Table 2-3. <br /> <br />2.4 Sample Gear <br /> <br />Ten distinct fish sample gears were used during the 6 Cataract trips <br />(Table 2-4). Each gear type was designed to sample certain habitats Of' <br />certain size fishes, and may have been used with greater intensity during <br />some tri ps. The sampl e gears used on each tri p and the number of sampl e <br />efforts are presented in Table 2-5. <br /> <br />Electrofishing was used regularly on all trips, although the number of <br />sample efforts was reduced on tri ps 2, 3, and 6 because of high and/or' <br />turbid water conditions. Gill nets and tru.el nets were al so used with <br />regularity, but heavy debris in the river on trips 2, 5 and 6 restricted <br />their use. Attempts were made to float a tru.el net fixed between largE! <br />bra 11 es in the center river channel duri ng tri ps 2 and 3, but thi s gear had <br />1 ittl e success. Seines were al so regul arl y used on each tri p; the small.. <br />mesh l/16-i nch mesh was used most frequently on tri ps 2 and 3 to capturE! <br />newly-hatched fish, and the 1/4-inch mesh seine was used on trips 4, 5, and <br />6 to capture the young-of-year after a m>onth of growth. Drift nets WerE! <br />used during trips 2, 3, and 4 to capture drifting larval fishes.. <br />Unseasonably warm spring temperatures apparently caused early reproduction <br />by most fishes in Cataract Canyon, and these drift nets had limited success <br />because the program was initiated too late in the season. long-handled dip <br />nets and hand-held kick screens (Mundo nets) were al so used to capture small <br />fishes in habitats too small and shallow for other gears. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.