Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II <br />II <br />I <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3-4 <br /> <br />3.2.3 Young-Of-The-Year <br /> <br />~ total of 509 young-of-the-year (YOY) Colorado squawfish were handled <br />during the 6 Cataract trips. A summary of the yay captured is presented -in <br />Appendix B. Of the 509 yay fish handled, 283 were returned alive and 2;~6 <br />were preserved to verify identification. Most of the fish that wel"e <br />preserved were captured in their larval and early juvenile stages when field <br />identification was impossible. <br /> <br />All fish that could not be positively identified afield were sent to <br />the Larval Fish Laboratory in Fort Collins, Colorado. That facility issued <br />three reports on the spec imens examined. These reports are incl uded in <br />Appendix C of this document. <br /> <br />the <br />was <br />ale <br /> <br />Estimated Hatching Time. Also included in Appendix B is an estimate of <br />number of days from hatching to capture for each individual yay. This <br />calculated by applying length/age regressions developed by Haynes et <br />(1985). The relationships are as follows: <br /> <br />REGRESSION A: For fish with a total length of less than 22 mm. <br /> <br />Age = -76.7105 + 17.4949L - l.055L2 + 0.0221L3 (r2 = 0.99) <br /> <br />REGRESSION B: For fish with total lengths of 22.0 to 47.0 mm <br />Age = -26.6421 + 2.7798L (r2 = 0.99) <br /> <br />When the estimated dates of hatching are plotted on a frequency <br />histogram (Figure 2), it becomes evident that in 1985, hatching of Colorado <br />squawfish was spread out over a considerable period of time. Some of the <br />variation seen in Figure 2 might be attributed to differential growth rates <br />or slight errors in length measurements afield, but the number of <br />observations indicate that hatching began in late June, peaked on July 1, <br />and continued through the first week of August. <br /> <br />Al though 1985 da ta for yay squawfi sh from other reg ions of the Upper <br />Basin are not available at the time of this writing, a comparison of the <br />data from Cataract Canyon is made with predicted hatching dates for Colorado <br />squawfish on the Yampa River for 1980 through 1984 (Figure 3, Haynes et ale <br />1985). The figures represent hatching times and not spawning times <br />(personal communication with Bob Muth, December 10, 1985). A correction <br />factor of 3-5 days can be appl ied to the predicted hatching times to <br />represent pred icted spawni ng times, - si nce Hamman (198l) reported incubation <br />times were 90-121 hours at water temperatures of 20-24 C. <br /> <br />Assuming that the 1980-1984 data represent normal hatching times for <br />the species in'the Yampa River (mid to late July and early August), it can <br />be hypothesized that squawfish found in Cataract Canyon hatch earlier <br />because of warmer water temperatures lower in the subbasin. In 1985, the <br />YOY squawfi sh handl ed in the Cataract Canyon area had hatched primarily the <br />first days of July. <br />