Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3.0 Scientific Basis And Underlying Principles <br /> <br />3-1 <br /> <br />April 2004 <br /> <br />3.0 SCIENTIFIC BASIS AND UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES <br /> <br />3.1 Scientific Basis For Plan <br /> <br />This Plan is based on scientific principles derived from research on floodplains <br />throughout the Colorado River Basin, as well as from other systems. The fundamental basis of <br />this Plan is that floodplains provide nursery habitat for razorback sucker, and restoration and <br />appropriate management of these floodplains will assist the recovery of this and other <br />endangered fish species. Floodplains develop along rivers with valley floors that are extensively <br />covered with alluvium and/or sand. The river flowing through this substrate carves an active <br />channel that is flanked by low relief bottomlands that may have groundwater connection with the <br />river and/or become inundated during high-flow periods. High-flow periods of most western <br />rivers are usually associated with snow-melt runoff in spring (Poff et al. 1997). The timing and <br />frequency of flooding, magnitude of flows, and duration of peak flows determine the degree of <br />floodplain connection to the river. Considerable scientific research has been conducted to better <br />understand the complex inter-relationships associated with formation, inundation, maintenance, <br />and desiccation of riverine floodplains (Ward 1989). <br /> <br />Flow regulation can disrupt hydrological and ecological connectivity between the river <br />channel and alluvial floodplains (Ward and Stanford 1995). Reduction in spring peaks can <br />reduce connectivity and lead to geomorphic channel changes and vegetative encroachment that <br />may exacerbate this disconnection (Andrews 1986; Graf 1978). Floodplain reconnection is vital <br />to restoring some of the structure and function of floodplains disrupted by flow regulation <br />(Stanford et al. 1996). <br /> <br />Flow of the middle Green River is largely regulated by Flaming Gorge Dam. This flow <br />regulation has reduced the frequency of connection of the river to floodplains, as well as the <br />duration of connection (Stanford 1994), and is believed to be a major factor in the endangerment <br />ofthe razorback sucker (Tyus and Karp 1990; Modde 1996, 1997). Tributary inflow, especially <br />from the Yampa River, can periodically affect flows of the middle Green River during spring <br />snow-melt runoff or from late-summer monsoonal rain storms. The relationship of flow <br />regulation and floodplain inundation in the middle Green River is sufficiently understood to <br />predict numbers, acreage, and types of floodplains at given river stages, but individual floodplain <br />dynamics are not well understood; e.g., flow and particle entrainment rates, sedimentation, water <br />retention. These inter-relationships are often confounded by physical, chemical, and biological <br />attributes and linkages that are unique to each floodplain site (Flo Engineering 1997; Crowl et al. <br />1998b). Given this complexity and dynamic character of floodplains and river flows, predictions <br />in floodplain formation and maintenance, as well as management plans for these floodplains, <br />must be considered provisional and subject to ongoing modification with new information from <br />scientific findings. <br />