Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Findings of age-O Colorado squawfish in the inflow to Lake Powell indicate that the primary dispersal <br />flow may be early spring spikes that usually occur in late February and early March, prior to the usual <br />spring runoff, and just prior to the spring ISl\1P sampling period. Valdez and Cowdell (1994) <br />reported densities of age-O Colorado squawfish of 1.05 fish/lOO m2 in April 1993, which was <br />comparable to 1.03 fish/IOO m2 in the lower 120 miles of the Green River and 0.92 fish/100 m2 in the <br />lower 35 miles of the Colorado River. By August, 1993, only 1 age-O Colorado squawfish was found <br />in the inflow, compared to 51 in April. A similar catch rate of 1.12 fish/1 00 m2 was reported in April <br />1994, but only 4 age-O fish were found in August, compared to 73 in April. These results indicate <br />that large numbers of age-O Colorado squawfish are being transported into Lake Powell in early <br />spring, but few are surviving. <br /> <br />The spike flows that occur in the Green River in February and March are primarily the result of early, <br />low-elevation runoff. These flows are independent of releases from Flaming Gorge Dam, and they <br />originate primarily from the Yampa, White, and Duchesne rivers, although other smaller tributaries <br />also contribute. Spike flows of varying magnitude occurred in every year ofISMP sampling from <br />1988 through 1995, and with each spike flow, there was a concurrent increase in water temperature <br />(Figure 8). We hypothesis that the combination of increased flows and warmer temperatures inundate <br />overwinter nursery backwaters and provide the cue by which these older age-O fish move to more <br />downstream locations. While we recognize that not all of the age-O fish in the nursery habitats move <br />downstream, we believe that movement of a substantial proportion of the fish from the nursery areas <br />contribute to much of the overwinter decrease in density. <br /> <br />The hypothesis of downstream movement by intermediate size Colorado squawfish is supported by <br />current size distributions and the historic setting. Valdez et al. (1982) and Osmundson et al. (1996) <br />reported an increasingly greater proportion of smaller Colorado squawfish in the lower reaches of the <br />upper Colorado River with distance downstream, suggesting a natural tendency for young fish to <br />move or to be transported downstream. Valdez (1990) also observed large numbers of age-O <br />Colorado squawfish transported downstream after a large, late-summer rainstorm nearly doubled the <br />flow of the lower Green River; these fish were transported for about 25 miles to the Lake Powell <br />inflow. <br /> <br />Recent observations indicate that young Colorado squawfish historically descended to lower, warmer, <br />more productive reaches of river such as Glen Canyon. Historically, the Colorado River through <br />Glen Canyon was a gentle, meandering, alluvial reach of river that would have provided an abundance <br />of nursery habitat for young fish. This area is now inundated by Lake Powell and no longer available <br />for the fish. <br /> <br />To test the hypothesis of downstream dispersal byage-O Colorado squaWfish during winter and early <br />spring spike flows, we compared the percentage decrease in overwinter density of fish with the slope <br />of cumulative flow for the period between samples (i.e., late September to late March). Presumably, <br />flow periods with steeper slopes would reflect a greater occurrence of flow spikes. We found no <br />clear relationship in this analysis. However, this analysis may not be sufficiently sensitive to <br />discriminate the occurrence of short-duration spikes. Flow spikes of only a few days may be of <br />sufficient magnitude to inundate backwaters and cue fish to move. <br /> <br />26 <br />