Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />of the study, releases were made with maximum allowable fluctuations, and in the second year, <br />releases were relatively steady. A more detailed description of these releases is provided in Section <br />4.0 Hydrology. Special releases from the dam were made in cooperation with Bureau of Reclamation <br />and Western Area Power Administration. <br /> <br />Flow release data from Flaming Gorge Dam were provided by Bureau of Reclamation, Salt Lake City <br />Office (Courtesy of Tom Ryan and Brad Vickers, Bureau of Reclamation). Data on flows and water <br />temperature for the Green River were obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream gage <br />located near Jensen, UT (station 09261000). Air temperature data were obtained from the National <br />Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) weather station located in Jensen. Historic flow <br />and temperature data were summarized from USGS data compiled in the GeoSelect Colorado River <br />Database, a CD-ROM format database produced by Hydrosphere Data Products, Inc. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />3.2 Backwater Mapping <br /> <br />Backwaters were selected in each reach based on size and depth, formation classification (i. e. chute <br />channel, scour channel, and eddy return channel), and access during winter months. Efforts were <br />made to select backwaters within each reach that represented different depths and formation <br />classifications. Consideration was also given to accessibility of backwaters during winter months <br />when ice cover prevented open water boat travel. Changes in backwater morphology were not <br />considered detrimental to habitat value so long as other minimum habitat requirements were not <br />violated. Only backwaters which met the ISMP (McAda et al. 1994) minimum requirements for a <br />suitable backwater (i.e., surface area of at least 30 m2 and maximum depth of at least 1.0 ft) were <br />selected. <br /> <br />A map of the shoreline and bathymetry was developed for each backwater selected. The shoreline <br />was mapped on 17 x 22-inch paper using a plane table and an alidade. Prominent features (trees, logs <br />and rocks) and principal substrate types (as boulder, cobble, gravel, sand and silt) were included on <br />the map. Contour isopleths were developed by measuring water depth (in feet) along 5 to 7 transects <br />across the backwater (depths were recorded in feet for consistency with the ISMP backwater <br />sampling protocol). Each map was transferred to AutoCAD, a computer-aided design package to <br />facilitate analyses and presentation. These habitat maps were reduced and printed on 8.5 x II-inch <br />paper for use as base maps during winter measurements. <br /> <br />3.3 Winter Habitat Measurements <br /> <br />The amount of nursery habitat was determined by measuring and mapping the physical and chemical <br />characteristics of each backwater from transects through various regions of the backwater. Physical <br />habitat was quantified in square meters by recording shoreline configuration, depth and area of free <br />water, thickness ofice cover, and current velocity on the 8.5 x II-inch base maps. Depth offree <br />water and thickness of surface and frazil ice were measured in feet (~.05 ft) with a staff gage <br />through holes drilled in the ice. Holes were made using an ice chisel, or a Strikemaster 49 cc gas- <br />powered ice auger with an 8-inch blade. Water velocity was measured with a Marsh-McBirney <br />current meter. <br /> <br />5 <br />