Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Shafer Canyon and at the Upper Loop (RM 11.0), while vertical wall habitat was common at the Loop <br />between RM 5 and 9. <br /> <br />A large rock slide at RM 1.5 on the Colorado River ("The Slide") had constricted the channel, forming <br />a compression riffle and a large, deep eddy. Habitat at this locale was somewhat unique and diverse <br />as compared to the rest of the region due to the presence of higher water velocities and deeper, <br />turbulent eddies. Sampling in this location produced a variety of species including Colorado squawfish <br />and humpback chub, as well as two razorback suckers in a previous investigation (Valdez et a1. 1982). <br /> <br />Two major drainages flow into the. Colorado River within this region including Indian Creek (RM <br />16.5) and Salt Creek (RM 3.6). Several smaller ephemeral drainages also empty into this region, <br />including Lockhart, Shafer, Buck, Lathrop, and Elephant Canyons. Flow of the Colorado River in this <br />region from 1985 to 1988 varied from about 2,000 to 42,000 cfs (See Section 2.6). The Colorado River <br />above this region is not impounded by any large mainstem dams, but its flow is affected by irrigation, <br />municipal, and indust.rial withdrawals as well as the flow of several major tributaries including the <br />Gunnison and Dolores Rivers. <br /> <br />2.3 Region 3: Confluence to Brown Betty <br /> <br />This region (Figure 5) extended from the confluence of the Colorado and Green Rivers (RM 216.5) <br />downst.ream to Rapid #1 (RM 212.5, 'Brown Betty Rapid'). It received the flow of both rivers and was <br />characterized by a deep, swift, and voluminous channel. The gradient was st.eeper (5 feet per mile) <br />than the areas above the confluence and the channel remained constricted by the talus slopes and <br />small rock slides, except for the area of Spanish Bottom where the river widened before entering <br />Cataract Canyon (Photos A-13 through A-16). <br /> <br />Fish habitat in this region was provided by deep runs, eddies, backwaters, cobble bars, and <br />shorelines. Only two types of shoreline habitat were present including boulder talus and tamarisk/willow <br />habitat. The boulder talus shoreline, which was interspersed with stretches of sand and silt, formed <br />many eddies and slackwaters. Tamarisk/willOW habitat was found primarily in the area of Spanish <br />Bottom. Several backwaters formed in this region as flows dropped in early summer. Most. were <br />relatively small but deep and were habitat for YOY Colorado squawfish and chubs as well as many <br />other species of native and non-native fishes. <br /> <br />The only tributary in this region of the study area was Lower Red Lake Canyon. Alluvial deposits <br />from this ephemeral drainage were relatively extensive and formed a large, shallow cobble area below <br />the mouth. Flows of the Colorado River below the confluence from 1985 to 1988 varied from 3,000 to <br />70,000 cfs (See Section 2.6). <br /> <br />2.4 Region 4: Cataract Canyon <br /> <br />This was the principal study region of this investigation (Figure 6). It encompassed 11 miles of deep <br />channel from 'Brown Betty Rapid', Rapid #1 (RM 212.3) to the top of 'Ten Cent Rapid', Rapid #26, (RM <br />201.5). Depending on the level of Lake Powell, 24 to 26 major rapids occurred within this region. The <br />gradient averaged 8 feet per mile with short sections of up to 30 feet per mile. This region of the <br />Colorado River had the steepest gradient in the upper basin as well as the deepest water, recorded at <br />92 feet below Rapid #2 (RM 211.8) by Valdez et al. (1982). Before Lake Powell, Cataract Canyon was <br />41 miles long with 62 major rapids (Dellenbaugh 1908), and extended from its present upstream margin <br />at RM 212 downst.ream to RM 171, about 1.5 miles above the confluence of the Dirty Devil River. <br /> <br />The character of the river within this region was dominated by rapids (Photos A-17 through A-24), <br />and their nature was controlled by river flows. Fish sampling was best at flows of less than 10,000 cfs, <br /> <br />9 <br />