Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />UST OF FIGURES <br />(Continued) <br /> <br />Number <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />Figure 15. Species associations between humpback chub and selected native and <br />non-native species within four selected habitats. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 46 <br /> <br />Figure 16. Dist.ribution of YOY Colorado squawfish by region, 1985-1988. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 50 <br /> <br />Figure 17-. Frequency of back-calculated hatching dates for YOY Colorado squawfish <br />compared to river temperature and flow of the Green River, Colorado River, <br />and Cataract Canyon, 1985-1988. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 53 <br /> <br />Figure 18. Mean total length (sample size) of YOY Colorado squawfish from the lower <br />50 miles of the Green River in four successive year classes. .................. 55 <br /> <br />Figure 19. Longitudinal distribution by age category of humpback, bonytail, roundtail, and <br />unclassified chubs in Cataract Canyon (RM 200.0 to 216.5), 1985-1988. ......... 57 <br /> <br />Figure 20. Principal components analysis of Cataract Canyon Gila showing the four <br />clust.ers of maximum membership; analysis of principal components 1 vs. principal <br /> <br />components 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 58 <br /> <br />Figure 21. Growth of humpback and bonytail chub from Cataract Canyon, compared to <br />bonytail chub from the Green River (Vanicek 1967). ........................ 65 <br /> <br />Figure 22. Monthly length-frequency hist.ograms for YOY chubs (Gila spp.) in the <br />Cataract Canyon Study Area for 1985-1988. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 67 <br /> <br />Figure 23. Gradient of a 4-mile reach of the Lake Powell Inflow, with maximum <br />recorded lake elevation, minimum observed elevation for this study, and <br />range of levels that produced the maximum number of backwaters. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 73 <br /> <br />Figure 24. Levels of Lake Powell from June to October, 1987 and 1988, that produced <br />the maximum number of backwaters in a 2-mile reach (RM 201.8 to 199.8) of inflow. . 74 <br /> <br />Figure 25. CPE for adult Colorado squawfish in the five study regions for 1985-1988, <br />expressed as number of fish per 10 hours of electrofishing. .................. 81 <br /> <br />Figure 26. CPE for adult Colorado squawfish in the fIVe study regions for 1985-1988, <br />expressed as number of fish per 100 feet of net per 100 hours ............... 81 <br /> <br />Figure 27. CPE for YOY Colorado squawfish in the five study regions for 1985-1988, <br />expressed as number of fish per 100 m2 seined. .......................... 83 <br /> <br />Figure 28. CPE for juvenile Colorado squawfish in the five study regions for 1985-1988, <br />expressed as number of fish per 10 hours of electrofishing. .................. 83 <br /> <br />Figure 29. CPE for adult humpback chub in the five st.udy regions for 1985-1988, <br />expressed as number of fish per 10 hours of electrofishing. .................. 84 <br /> <br />Figure 30. CPE for adult humpback chub in the five study regions for 1985-1988, <br />expressed as number of fish per 100 feet of net per 100 hours ............... 84 <br /> <br />'IN <br />