Laserfiche WebLink
<br />13 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1988 at a discharge of 340 cfs (9.6 cms). On April 6, just after ice-out, an average daily <br />discharge of 1,450 cfs (41.1 cms) resulted in the same stage elevation of 92.14 feet. <br /> <br />Ice Conditions <br /> <br />Surface ice covered the Yampa River from December through early March in both <br /> <br />winters investigated. Ice cover in large streams, like the Yampa River, is normally in <br /> <br />floatation (Rantz 1982). As stage increases or ice thickens, increased upward force by the <br /> <br />water causes tension, or coastal, cracks in the ice, usually near the banks. The ice floats to <br /> <br />a position of equilibrium, and water fills the tension cracks and refreezes to form a solid ice <br /> <br /> <br />cover. This same phenomenon occurs with a drop in stage, where weight of the unsupported <br /> <br /> <br />ice causes stress cracks along the banks and the ice falls to an equilibrium position with the <br /> <br />water. Under extremely cold conditions, heavy surface ice in contact with the stream may <br /> <br />resist this state of equilibrium, causing flow conditions to more closely resemble a closed <br /> <br />conduit. In mid-February, small increases in discharge (197 to 229 cfs; 5.6 to 6.5 cms) of the <br /> <br />Yampa River were not sufficient to raise the level of the ice. The cross sectional area <br /> <br />remained fixed, like a closed conduit, resulting in an increase in water velocity. <br /> <br />Just as the process of ice formation throughout winter effectively increased stage at <br /> <br />a given discharge on the Yampa River, spring breakup had the opposite effect. In cross <br /> <br />sectional measurements taken March 3 and 15, 1988, a 10 cis decrease in discharge resulted <br /> <br />in a stage reduction of 0.4 feet (12.2 cm). This was caused by warm air temperatures in <br /> <br />March, and loss of shoreline ice at anchor points. This resulted in an increase in water <br /> <br />flowing along the river's edge, loss of the damming effect of the shore ice, and reduction of <br /> <br />stage at a given flow. <br />