Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I: <br />I~ <br />I; <br />I <br />I~ <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I- <br />I. <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />14 <br />I <br />I, <br /> <br />- . <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />Lanigan and Berry 1979, ERI 1982), longitudinal trends in species <br />composition over time are perceptible. <br />The most apparent temporal and spatial trends are seen in the <br />introduced red shiner. Crosby (1975a) found a predominance of red shiners <br />(79-93%) in the lower 30 miles of river, with a shift to speckled dace <br />(19-35%) an~ flannelmouth suckers (32-48%) from RM 30 to the Utah-Colorado <br />border at about RM 70. <br />Lanigan and Berry (1979) found a similar predominance of red shiners <br />but the pattern extended further upstream to Hell's Hole Canyon where the <br />species made up 60% of the catch. Similarly, ERI found a predominance of <br />red shiners near the confluence (63%) and at the Mt. Fuel Bridge (57%). A <br />sample taken at the Utah-Colorado border in 1981 showed that red shiners <br />still dominated the catch, but only with 32% composition. This pattern <br />suggests that the red shiner has dominated the fish fauna of the lower White <br />River since at least the early 70's. Its populations appear to vary yearly <br />within sample sites. It is abundant in the downstream reaches and its <br />numbers appear to be greatly diminished above the Utah-Colorado border as <br />indicated by the studies in Colorado (Prewitt et ale 1978). <br />The second fish species exhibiting distributional trends is the native <br />speckled dace. In no study cited did the speckled dace compose over 18% of <br />the catch downstream of Asphalt Wash (RM 45). Upstream of this site, the <br />speckled dace became more numerous and the red shiner less numerous. <br />Catches further upstream in Colorado (ERI 1982) were dominated by speckled <br />dace, although this is not reflected in Prewitt et ale (1978). <br />