Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Dates <br />Year1 <br />(1986-87) <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I: <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I: <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 2. Purpose and dates of field trips conducted for the Winter Habitat Study. <br /> <br />Purpose <br /> <br />Year 2 <br />(1987-88) <br /> <br />Capture Fish and Implant Transmitters <br />Capture Fish and Implant Transmitters <br />Reconnaissance Tracking <br />Tracking and Monitoring Trip #1 <br />Tracking and Monitoring Trip #2 <br />Tracking and Monitoring Trip #3 <br />Tracking and Monitoring Trip #4 <br />Tracking and Monitoring Trip #5 <br />Tracking and Monitoring Trip #6 <br /> <br />October 9-17 <br />October 25-30 <br />November 13-18 <br />December 2-11 <br />January 5-1 <br />Jan 28 - Feb 6 <br />February 15-23 <br />March 9-17 <br />March 23-31 <br /> <br />October 5-14 <br />October 20-29 <br />November 18 <br />December 1-10 <br />January 5-14 <br />Jan 25 - Feb 3 <br />February 15-24 <br />March 8-17 <br />March 22-31 <br /> <br />radiotram;mitters. Other endangered fishes <br />were weighed, measured, lagged and released, <br />including Colorado squawfisl1 and razorback <br />suckers considered too small for surgical <br />implant. No humpback chub (Gila cypha) or <br />bonytail (Gila e/egans) were captured during <br />this investigation. <br /> <br />All fish species were counted and released, <br />while actual electrofishing time was recorded in <br />seconds on the intemal WP-15 timers, and <br />used in calculating calch per unit effort (CPE) <br />as numbers of fish per 10 hours. Pertinent <br />data were recorded on forms provided. by the <br />FWS, and compatible with their database <br />management system, dBASE 111+. <br /> <br />Since the study area included f1atwater and <br />whitewater regions, aluminum jonboats and <br />whitewater rafts were used. The jonboats were <br />16 feet long, and powered by 25 or 35 hp <br />Mercury outboards. One 14-foot jonboat with <br />a 9.9 hp outboard was stored at Echo Park <br />because winter road conditions often prohibited <br />trailoring a boat into the area. <br /> <br />The rafts included 17 and 18-foot Riken <br />Havac;us equipped with rowing frames for <br />whitewater and XD-25 hp Mercury outboards for <br />f1atwater areas. A 16-foot jonboat and the 18- <br />foot Havasu raft were equipped with <br />electrofishing systems which were removed <br />during tracking. <br /> <br />3.2 Implanting The Radiotransmitters <br /> <br />3.2.1 Radiotransmitters and Receivers Used <br /> <br />Radiotelemetry was used to locate anrt follow <br />movements of adult Colorado squawfish and <br />razorback suckers. Twenty radiolransmitters <br />(fish modules). were provided by FWS durinq <br />year 1; 10 manulactured by Smith-Root (model <br />PAO) and 10 manufactured hy AVM (model <br />SM-1). The Smilh-Rool and AVM transmitters <br />were powered by lithium and mercury batteries, <br />respectively, each with a 12 to 14-montl1 life <br />expectancy. For year 2, 20 Smith-Root (P-40) <br />radiotransmitters were purchased by BIO/WEST <br />because of the more favorable performance of <br />this product during year 1 (See Appendix F). <br /> <br />The transmitters used in this investigation <br />operated within Ihe 40.660 to 40.700 MHz <br />range, with. transmission rates of 40 to 80 <br />pulses per minute. All transmitters were tested <br />for pulse and frequency upon receipt from Ihe <br />factory. and each was dipped in melted <br />beeswax prior to implantation to minimize <br />negative reaction by the peritoneum and <br />internal organs of the recipient fish. Pulse and <br />frequency were rechecked prior to and <br />immediately following implantation 10 record any <br />variation in frequency or pulse from factory <br />specifications, and to minimize Ihe difficulty in <br />locating lransmiUer signals during tracking. <br /> <br />6 <br />