My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8023
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 10:52:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8023
Author
Wydoski, R. S. and J. Hamill.
Title
Evolution of Recovery Programs for Upper Colorado River Fishes.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />American Fisheries Society. Members of the Bonneville Chapter of the <br />American Fisheries Society wrote a position paper that stronglysupported the <br />protection of natural habitats and species that are threatened, endangered, or <br />of special concern in February, 1978. The status of the endangered Colorado <br />River fishes in 1978 was published by members of the Endangered Species <br />Committee, Bonneville Chapter (Holden et al. 1978). Members of the Threatened <br />and Endangered Species Committee of the American Fisheries Society developed <br />systematic guidelines and policies for introductions of threatended and <br />endangered fishes to supplement an existing population or to establish a new <br />population (Williams et al. 1988). These guidelines focus on planning <br />introductions, implemenation, and evaluation of the introduction that is <br />intended to increase the probability of success in recovery of rare fishes. <br /> <br />Conservation Plan. In August, 1980, the Service began to prepare a <br />conservation plan based on historical streamflows. The draft plan released in <br />June, 1985, was severely criticized by water developers because the plan <br />recommended annual flows of 13.6 million acre-feet that were about one-half the <br />average flow needed to fulfill requirements of the Colorado River Compact <br />(Zallen 1980). Consequently, this plan was never implemented and was withdrawn <br />in February, 1984. <br /> <br />Colorado Water ConQress.__The directors of the Colorado Water Congress <br />establishedm a Special Project on Threatened and Endangered Species in <br />December, 1983. The goal of the Special Project was to find an administrative <br />solution that would be acceptable to water interests, the Federal government, <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.