My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8023
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 10:52:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8023
Author
Wydoski, R. S. and J. Hamill.
Title
Evolution of Recovery Programs for Upper Colorado River Fishes.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The Memorandum of Understanding was amended to include an investigation of <br />the humpback chub in the Little Colorado River (Kaeding and Zimmerman 1982) and <br />to expand the field investigations to include the Dolores and Gunnison rivers <br />(Valdez et al. 1982a). Additional funds were provided by the Bureau of Land <br />Management to include the White River in the field investigations (Lanigan <br />andBerry 1981). <br /> <br />Laboratory investigations outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding for <br />the Colorado squawfish included swimming stamina, temperature tolerance and <br />preferences, total dissolved solids tolerance and preference, and bioassays of <br />potentially<toxic trace elements. In addition, various contracted studies <br />were completed on the physical-chemical habitat conditions on the Green and <br />Colorado rivers~ culture of the rare fishes, disease survey, movements of <br />Colorado squawfish in the inlet to Lake Powell, and fish stomach content <br />analysis (Miller et al. 1982, Part 3). <br /> <br />The work of the CRFP continued after 1982 with emphasis on gaps in the <br />knowledge of the ecological requirements of the four rare fishes. Primary <br />emphasis was on delineating ecological requirements such as necessary <br />streamflows, describing movements (especially associated with spawning), and <br />identifying factors limiting recruitment (Archer et al. 1984). <br /> <br />Coordination/Cooperation Between Agencies <br /> <br />Colorado River Fishes Recovery Team. The Endangered Species Act of 1973, <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.