My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8192
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 10:52:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8192
Author
Wydoski, D.
Title
Review of Report Regarding Evaluation of Gravel-Pit Ponds.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />largemouth bass migrated the most between the two ponds. Roundtail <br />chub was the only native fish to move between the two ponds. <br /> <br />4. Within four months following draining, removal of nonnative fishes, <br />and construction of a connection channel, nonnative fishes invaded and <br />recolonized Gardner Pond. Within eight months, five species of <br />nonnative fishes had successfully reproduced in Gardner Pond. Two <br />conclusions were evident: a) Gardner Pond had again become a haven for <br />nonnative fishes, and b) nonnative fishes are extremely resilient. <br />Any ponds, whether in the 10-, 50-, or 100- year floodpl ain with <br />bottoms irregularly shaped and contoured as depressions, provide <br />perennial, off-channel habitats for nonnative fishes to grow and <br />reproduce. Such ponds that are connected to the river allow sub-adult <br />and adult nonnative fishes uninhibited access to the river and ~ <br />other off - channel habi tats connected to the ri ver . Although such <br />ponds are used by native fishes only during runoff, nonnative fishes <br />appear to benefit more from such perennial, lentic habitats. In any <br />event, ponds wi th depress ions provi de a constant supply source of <br />nonnative fish that can potentially escape to the mainstem river. <br /> <br />5. Hotspot Pond did not drain following runoff in 1996. Therefore, an <br />accurate assessment of whether nonnative fish populations could be <br />reduced or eliminated was not possible. Usually, during low-water <br />years, this pond is almost entirely dewatered by late-August or early- <br />September leaving only a mud flat at the upper end. Irrigation waste <br />water that flows through the pond to the river is the only source of <br />water. The only habitat available for fish is near the connection <br />channel near the river. However, during high-water years, such as <br />1996, thi s pond does not comp 1 ete 1 y drai n 1 eavi ng adequate water <br />depths for fish to survive during the winter. In addition, <br />groundwater levels during high-water years probably help retain pond <br />water levels longer than during low-water years. If ponds are <br />rec 1 aimed, steeper bottom slopes found in Hotspot Pond wi 11 be <br />required for ponds to drain during high-flow years to reduce or <br />eliminate perennial habitat for nonnative fishes. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Major recommendations (underscored print) are: <br /> <br />1. Avoid ConnectinQ Isolated Ponds to the River That are Deep <br />Depressions. Floodplain habitat should not contain irregular-shaped, <br />deep depression ponds. These type of habitats are perennial havens <br />for nonnative fishes and provide potential sources for nonnative <br />fishes to escape to the mainstem river. If deep depression habitats <br />cannot be rehabi 1 i tated by recontouri ng and reshapi ng to provi de <br />seasonal, ephemeral habitat, they should be sufficiently diked to <br />prevent escapement of nonnative fi shes such as centrarchids and <br />ictalurids. <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.