Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />11. In addition to being effective predators on larval endangered fishes, <br />juvenile nonnative fish species are more than likely significant <br />competitors with larval and juvenile endangered fishes. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Competition by two species occurs when food resources are limited, the <br />food is shared, and one of the species is adversely affected. <br />Competition among freshwater fish species is often difficult to document <br />because these fishes lack specialization in food habits so that much <br />overlap occurs in their food habits. However, the extremely low <br />densities of zooplankton during the spring runoff that serve as food for <br />larval razorback suckers and the high percentage of nonnative fishes in <br />backwaters of Upper Basin rivers provide evidence that competition may <br />also reduce survival of razorback larvae. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />12. Laboratory and pond studies conducted at the Dexter National Fish <br />Hatchery, New Mexico documented that about 2 months are required for <br />larval razorback suckers to achieve 25 mm TL (1 in). Flooding of <br />terraces or depressions for a short period of time (i.e., 7 to 10 days) <br />will not be adequate for larval razorback suckers to reach 25 mm TL when <br />they would no longer be vulnerable to abundant adult red shiners based on <br />size of the mouth-gape from studies conducted through Utah State <br />University. However, gape size is irrelevant to predation by the fathead <br />minnow because this species attacked catostomid larvae as a school, tore <br />the prey into pieces, and consumed the pieces in a Pacific Northwest <br />study. It is not known if other small nonnative fish species in the <br />Upper Basin are capable of tearing larvae into pieces and consuming the <br />pieces. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Red shiners and fathead minnows compose 90% or more of the fish that <br />occupy backwater habitats in Upper Basin rivers based on the Recovery <br />Program's Interagency Standardized Monitoring Program. When levees were <br />removed to reconnect floodplain habitats with Upper Basin rivers, <br />nonnative fishes quickly colonized and dominated these habitats in the <br />Upper Colorado and middle Green rivers. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />13. Starvation of larval razorback suckers during their critical period from <br />the loss of productive floodplain habitats through regulated streamflows <br />combined with a high vulnerability to predation by nonnative fishes <br />appear to be the most important factors limiting recruitment in the Upper <br />Basin. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />14. Reconnecting floodplain habitats with rivers in the Upper Basin is <br />expected to benefit razorback suckers since these habitats will provide <br />adequate quantity and quality of food organisms that are required by <br />larval razorback suckers to survive their "critical period". Larvae and <br />juveniles of other fishes including the other endangered species <br />(Colorado squawfish, humpback chub, and bony tail) are also expected to <br />benefit from zooplankton and benthic macroinvertebrates that enter the <br />main channel and backwaters from floodplain habitats. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Predation and competition from nonnative fishes on native fish larvae and <br />juveniles can be reduced in floodplain habitats with high densities of <br />zooplankton and benthic food organisms that can serve as alternate food <br />items. Floodplain habitats with rooted aquatic vegetation or other <br />structure also provide protection to razorback larvae and juveniles that <br />readily use such cover when available. In contrast, there is little to <br />no survival of larval razorback suckers in the present low velocity <br />habitats (primarily backwaters without cover) in Upper Basin rivers. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />15. Historically, the continuum concept and the flood pulse concept both <br />applied to nutrient cycling in the turbid, unproductive rivers of the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin. However, fragmentation of Upper Basin rivers <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />I <br />