Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />approached 650 m3s/s (- 23,000 cfs; Wick and Cluer 1998). At lower <br />streamflows, the backwater effect does not occur and the channel becomes <br />narrower so that higher water velocities can scour sand from the cobble <br />substrate to make it suitable for razorback sucker spawning. Wick and <br />Cluer (1998) suggested the low catch rate of razorback sucker larvae in <br />light traps from the middle Green River during 1995 reported by Muth et <br />al. (1998) may have been caused by excessive sedimentation in the cobble <br />and gravel substrate at Razorback Bar that resulted in poor reproductive <br />success. Although razorback suckers spawn in rivers on the ascending limb <br />of the hydrograph and can spawn in floodplain ponds or isolated lagoons <br />that may not have gravel or rubble substrate, these observations <br />demonstrate the magnitude and timing of releases from Flaming Gorge Dam <br />are crucial to Razorback Bar, the primary razorback spawning site in the <br />middle Green River. Therefore, the magnitude and timing of regulated <br />water releases from Flaming Gorge Dam are important to ensure that (1) the <br />substrate at Razorback Bar is clean and suitable for razorback sucker <br />spawning, and (2) flows will allow inundation of floodplains so that <br />larval razorbacks at swimup have access to productive floodplains during <br />their critical period. Lower releases from Flaming Gorge Dam are needed <br />to maintain suitable conditions on "Razorback Bar" for spawning but higher <br />releases are needed shortly afterward to inundate floodplains and provide <br />access for swimup razorback larvae to productive nursery areas. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />IV. ROLE OF PREDATION AND COMPETITION IN SURVIVAL OF LARVAL ENDANGERED FISHES <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Stanford et al. (1996) reported that one of three general principles of stream <br />ecology related to streamflow regulation is that "native biodiversity <br />decreases and nonnative species proliferate". Predation and competition by <br />nonnative fishes have been demonstrated to have an adverse impact on native <br />fishes in various North American waters (Moyle et al. 1986). These two <br />factors are also believed to be significant in the decline of the endangered <br />Colorado River fishes. The responses of both native (including endangered) <br />and nonnative fishes will have to be monitored closely with habitat <br />enhancement of floodplains in the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Minckley et al. (1991) considered predation by nonnative fishes to be the <br />single-most important factor in recruitment failure of razorback sucker in <br />Lake Mohave in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Jonez and Sumner (1954) <br />reported that carp (Cvorinus caroio) fed on the eggs of razorback suckers in <br />Lake Mohave and young bass (Micropterus salmoides) and sunfish (Lepomis sp.) <br />fed on razorback larvae. Researchers also believe that predation by nonnative <br />fishes is an important factor in the Upper Basin (Tyus and Saunders 1996). <br />Reference to predation by nonnative fishes is most often related to fish <br />species that are known to be piscivorous such as members of the Families <br />Centrarchidae, Ictaluridae, and Esocidae. However, the most numerous fishes <br />in backwaters of the Upper Basin are nonnative minnows that may be more <br />important predators than more widely recognized piscivorous species. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Although predation on endangered fishes in the Upper Basin occurs by <br />nonnative, piscivorous fishes in the Family Centrarchidae such as the green <br />sunfish (Leoomis cvanellus), smallmouth bass (Microoterus dolomieui), <br />largemouth bass, the Family Ictaluridae primarily in the channel catfish <br />(Ictalurus ounctatus), and one member of the Family Esocidae, the northern <br />pike (Esox lucius), several nonnative minnows (particularly, fathead minnows, <br />Pimeohales oromelas and red shiners, Cvorinella lutrensis) may be even more <br />important predators on the endangered Colorado River fishes and may also be <br />important competitors .with the endangered fishes. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A. Predation. predation on larval fish significantly decreases their <br />survival (Leggett 1986). Although razorback sucker gametes are viable and <br />larvae are produced through successful natural reproduction in the Upper <br />Basin (Muth et al. 1998), the swimup larvae are highly vulnerable to <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />I <br />