Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />large riverine environments (Welcomme 1985). The most comprehensive <br />studies of plankton communities in rivers and floodplains have been made <br />in tropical rivers of Venezuela (Saunders and Lewis 1988a, 1988b, 1989; <br />Twombly and Lewis 1987, 1989). Mean densities of cladocerans and cope pods <br />(the most abundant taxa) were 421 organisms per liter in a floodplain <br />(Laguna la Orsinera). Welcomme (1985, 1989) summarized the range of <br />zooplankton densities (combined species) in floodplains ranged between 0.2 <br />and 24,000 per liter. Various studies have reported zooplankton densities <br />that were 30 (Welcomme 1989) to 100 (Hamilton et al. 1990) times greater <br />in floodplain habitats than in the adjacent river channels. The <br />differences in zooplankton densities are due to seasonal pulses by <br />different species (Welcomme 1985). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Information on zooplankton densities in temperate rivers of North America <br />are limited. The mean number of zooplankton in backwaters of the Missouri <br />River between April and October was 6.7 organisms per liter (Kallemeyn and <br />Novotny 1977). Data for zooplankton in floodplains of the Missouri River <br />were not available because extensive channelization has eliminated <br />periodic inundation of the floodplain. Only one study included rotifers <br />among the zooplankton taxa studied in the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br />Grabowski and Hiebert (1989) sampled rotifers in 1988 using a 25 micron <br />plankton net and reported between 0 and 0.1 rotifers per liter in the main <br />channel of the middle Green River and between 0 and 14.9 rotifers per <br />liter in backwater habitats along this river reach. They did not sample <br />floodplain habitats during their study. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Although direct comparisons of zooplankton densities in the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin cannot be made because different sampling methods were used by <br />the various investigators, the trends in zooplankton density by habitat <br />are the same with the lowest density in the main river channels, higher in <br />backwaters, and highest in floodplain habitats (Tables 1 and 2). The <br />following discussion focuses on cladocerans and copepods since these two <br />taxa constitute the most abundant prey items in the upper basin for which <br />data are available. The upper value in mean number of cladocerans and <br />copepods per liter in main channels of the Upper Basin was 1.3, 13.1 for <br />backwaters and 81.5 for floodplain habitats (Table 1). This summary of <br />Upper Basin zooplankton studies demonstrates that habitats with lower <br />water velocities (backwaters and floodplains) are more productive than <br />habitats with higher water velocities (main channels) and that floodplains <br />are the most productive habitats. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />While the seasonal dynamics of zooplankton have been documented in the <br />literature (Hynes 1970; Welcomme 1985), few studies have been done on this <br />aspect of zooplankton dynamics in Upper Basin river/floodplain habitats. <br />The number of zooplankton (combined species) in a 147-ha wetland <br />depression (Old Charley Wash) along the middle Green River were highest <br />(43 [1995] to 54 [1996] organisms/liter) in June during the descending <br />limb of the spring runoff (Figure 17 of Modde 1997). During the summer of <br />1991, the mean number of zooplankton increased from - 200 per liter in <br />June to nearly 700 per liter in August in the same wetland depression <br />(Mabey and Shiozawa 1993; Table 2). However, the mean number of <br />cladocerans and copepods per liter was higher in the main channel of the <br />middle Green River during July, 1991 (1.3/1) than in August, 1991 (0.3/1) <br />and in a small backwater, 7.1/1 in July and 1.4 in August (Table 2) The <br />higher mean values in the backwaters in July were probably due either to <br />(1) escapement of zooplankton from floodplain habitats when they are <br />connected by high spring streamflows or (2) displacement into the river <br />from off-channel habitats as the streamflows subsided (Kallemeyn and <br />Novotny 1977; Welcomme, 1985, 1989). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />11 <br />