My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9410
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 10:51:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9410
Author
Wydoski, R. S. and E. J. Wick.
Title
Ecological Value of Floodplain Habitats to Razorback Suckers in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />included extremely variable streamflows and high sediment loads. These fishes <br />evolved together and, more than likely, formed a stable fish community where <br />competition and predation were balanced. The main natural predator on the <br />native fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin was the Colorado squawfish. <br />The other native species occupied various habitats (i.e., niches) that reduced <br />competition for food resources. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Today, the fish fauna in most areas of the Colorado River Basin bears little <br />resemblance to the fish community that occurred historically. Nonnative fish <br />species now compose 76% (42 of 55 species) of the fish community in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin (Tyus et al. 1982). Since the nonnative fishes did not <br />evolve with the endangered fishes, mechanisms to balance predation and <br />competition to allow co-existence have not developed so nonnative fishes <br />predominate in the present fish community. This change in the fish community <br />is consistent with ecological theory where species that are more efficient in <br />capturing and converting food into biomass (i.e., nonnative species) will <br />persist over other species (i.e., native species) as resources become scarce <br />(Tilman 1982) . <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />III. ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF FLOODPLAINS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The importance of the land-water interface to the productivity of lotic <br />systems has been recognized for over twenty-five years (Allan 1995; Hynes <br />1970; Hynes 1983; Schlosser 1990, 1991; Ward 1989). However, interpretation <br />of the complexity of biological responses and importance of geomorphological <br />or hydrological processes has occurred only recently. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Historically, the ecological concepts of the river continuum (Vannote et al. <br />1980) and flood pulse (Junk et al. 1989) applied to the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin. The river continuum concept applied to the headwaters and high <br />gradient, restricted meander, canyon reaches while the flood pulse. concept <br />applied to low gradient, unrestricted reaches that form floodplains in broad <br />valleys. Lotic systems not only transfer organic matter from upstream reaches <br />in arid or semi-arid regions (i.e., continuum concept) but also deposit this <br />material in floodplains where these nutrients aid in high productivity of <br />invertebrates that periodically transfers food organisms to the main channel <br />of the river (i.e., flood pulse concept). Most of the productivity in a large <br />river-floodplain ecosystem occurs in the floodplain and is dependent upon the <br />duration of inundation and the area of inundation (Junk et al. 1989). With <br />dam construction, river ecosystems became fragmented (Ward and Stanford 1983, <br />1995) so that the continuum concept of energy transfer has been greatly <br />disrupted. Although the flood pulse concept was probably more important to <br />energy transfer than the continuum concept before Upper Basin rivers were <br />altered, the flood pulse concept is even more important today to productivity <br />of the present fragmented river ecosystem where extensive levees continue to <br />separate much of the floodplain habitat from main channels. The major zone of <br />productivity in a floodplain is the "moving littoral" (i.e., a shallow zone <br />that extends from the edge of the waterline to several meters in depth) <br />because it covers the maximum area of a floodplain for a given flood as it <br />traverses the floodplain during inundation and draining (Junk et al. 1989). <br /> <br />Floods and floodplains are now understood to be essential components of large <br />river systems (Bayley 1991; Petts and Maddock 1994; Sedell et al. 1989; <br />Welcomme 1995). The energy dynamics of large rivers is strongly influenced by <br />floodplain habitats (Sedell et al. 1989) where productivity is higher than in <br />river channel habitats (Hynes 1970; Welcomme 1985; Welcomme 1989). <br />Floodplains provide a greater opportunity for retention and processing of <br />nutrients and organic matter than main river channels (Sparks 1995). The <br />spawning strategies of fishes in many tropical and temperate areas are <br />correlated with the flood pulse that is associated with high productivity in <br />shallow, flooded areas (Copp 1989; Junk et al. 1989). Ephemeral wetlands in <br />arid regions (e.g., floodplains, arroyos, and playa lakes) are not included in <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.