My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Management and Disturbance Effects on Water Yeild
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Management and Disturbance Effects on Water Yeild
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:37:31 PM
Creation date
6/4/2009 10:39:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.250
Description
Water Issues
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
2/27/2007
Author
Polly Hays, C. A, Troendle, J. M. Nankervis, A. Peavy
Title
Management and Disturbance Effects on Water Yeild
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ist ric ! ater YieId <br />The WRENSS Hydrologic Model (Troendle and Leaf 1980; Troendle and Nankervis <br />2000; Troendle et al. 2003; and Swanson 2004) was used to simulate water available for <br />streamflow, or water.yield, from the South Platte River Basin. As was determined for the <br />Nocth Platte River Basin (Troendle and Nankervis 2000; Troendle et al. 2003), water <br />yield from NFS lands in the South Platte River Basin has steadily declined since the early <br />1900s (Table 3). As noted earlier, two scenarios for spruce-fir were simulated for each of <br />the 20-year intervals from 1860 to 1997, and a single scenario was used to extrapolate <br />current conditions without disturbance from 1997 to 2060. In the first simulation <br />scenario, the current spruce-fir stands were adjusted to reflect change over time in the <br />same manner as for the other species. In the second scenario, the spruce-fir stands were <br />maintained at their current condition throughout 1860 to 1997. Simulated results for both <br />scenarios are presented (Table 3). The consensus of the R2 Silviculture and Ecology staff <br />was that the current spruce-fir stands were most likely, on average, to be present on the <br />same sites during the entire time from 1860 to 1997 because spruce-fir is a climax tree <br />species. This does not imply the stands were static but it does assume the stands were not <br />"reset" during that period. Given that spruce-fir is less likely to replace itself in a stand- <br />replacing scenario and is more likely to sustain itself over time, the decision to simulate <br />the no-change scenario seemed reasonable. Similar assumptions are less likely to be the <br />case for the balance of species present. <br />Simulated water yield from NFS land in the South Platte River Basin was greatest ca <br />1920 (Table 3) and has declined in proportion to the subsequent vegetation density <br />increases (see Table 2). The net reduction in water yield occurring from 1920 to 1997 is <br />equivalent to about 1.8 area inches or 261,000 acre-feet from the 1.7 million acres of NFS <br />land in the scenario that holds spnice-fir constant (Table 3). The simulated decline in <br />water yield was slightly greater at 2.1 area inches (about 300,000 acre-feet) with spruce- <br />fir stands altered similarly to the other species. Decreases in water yield from NFS land in <br />the North Platte River Basin were estimated to be 3.4 area inches from 1860 to 1997 <br />(Troendle et al. 2003). Average precipitation and streamflow are much lower in the South <br />Platte River Basin than in the North Platte River Basin, so changes in flow resulting from <br />either increases or decreases in vegetation are expected to be smaller. <br />Numerous uncertainties, or risks, are inherent in the hydrologic simulations. Some <br />uncertainties are more or less constant for each simulation while others vary. <br />Uncertainties associated with the application of the hydrologic model probably do not <br />vary from application to application. The strength of the WRENSS Hydrologic Model is <br />in the assessment of changes in water yield. Prediction of absolute water yield is less <br />reliable. The uncertainties associated with the vegetation descriptions input to the model <br />probably have a greater impact on the outcome than the model itsel£ The most reliable <br />estimate of water yield is likely to be that for the year 1997, the reference year, because <br />that is the year best represented by the available stand description data. Although we have <br />equal confidence in the capability of the hydrologic model to simulate water yield for <br />each of the 20-year time increments, those simulations used projected, or adjusted, stand <br />characteristics. The reliability of the historical and future water yield simulations, relative <br />to current conditions, are directly related to the reliability of the projection of forest stand <br />conditions back or forward in time. Our approach to changing stand conditions over time <br />12 2/2/2007
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.