My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Whooping Crane Migrational Habitat Use Draft (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Whooping Crane Migrational Habitat Use Draft (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:37:13 PM
Creation date
6/3/2009 9:41:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.100
Description
Adaptive Management Workgroup
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
8/6/2008
Author
Shay Howlin, Clayton Derby, Dale Strickland, Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc.
Title
Whooping Crane Migrational Habitat Use Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
bank of the river, one down the centerline of the main river channel, and six transects located in <br />the uplands surrounding and parallel to the river. The study area was further divided into two <br />segments: the east segment between Chapman and the Nebraska Highway 10 (Minden) Bridge, <br />and the west segment from the Minden Bridge to the Lexington Bridge. Two planes, each with <br />two surveyors, surveyed two east-west transects within each segment of the study area each <br />survey day. The first flight surveyed the river from the south bank with both observers looking <br />out of the north side of the plane and focused on the river, and the return flight surveyed one of <br />the seven transects parallel to the river corridor. Flights began a half-hour before sunrise and <br />started with the river transect flown in the westward direction. There were changes to the <br />orientation and start locations of the flights during the first years of protocol implementation <br />(Appendix A). The final method used four start locations with alternating chronological order of <br />the two segments for each plane. This method was implemented to allocate the earlier survey <br />times more evenly throughout the study area. <br />The monitoring documented all locations used by crane groups throughout the study area. Crane <br />groups located by the aerial surveys were continuously monitored by ground-based field crews <br />until the cranes left the study area or their location became unknown. This set of observations <br />comprised the systematic sample of observations. Crane groups located in the study area by <br />method other than the aerial survey (the field crew, other biologists, or the public) comprised the <br />opportunistic sample of observations. Activities were sampled every 15 minutes while crane <br />groups were being observed, by documenting the observed activity. Activities were categorized <br />as: 1) alert behavior: crane alert and scanning horizon; 2) courtship behavior: crane performing <br />unison call and/or dancing; 3) agonistic/defensive behavior: defensive or offensive display with <br />other birds (whooping cranes, sandhill cranes, etc.); 4) feeding: any behavior suggesting the bird <br />is in the act of feeding, such as a crane flipping over objects and/or probing for food or slow <br />locomotion interrupted by these activities; 5) preening: crane preening feathers; and 6) <br />resting/loafing: crane standing still in one place. <br />After the crane group departed the study area, habitat characteristics were measured at whooping <br />crane use locations. Habitat measurements included land cover, river profile surveys, estimation <br />of unobstructed view in four directions, and substrate categorization. The river profiles were <br />measured at three transects perpendicular to the flow, with the middle transect traversing through <br />the use area and the endpoints of all transects at obstructions greater than five feet (ft; 1.5 meters <br />[m]) above water level (PRESP 2005). <br />All analyses were conducted separately for crane groups located through the systematic aerial <br />surveys and for crane groups located systematically and opportunistically. Observations of crane <br />groups located by the aerial surveys were included in the systematic sample of locations. Each <br />observation in this sample had known inclusion probabilities based on the flight coverage of the <br />study area and the probability of detection. All observations of a crane group by ground-based <br />observers on a given day were included in the systematic dataset if the crane group had been <br />observed initially from the systematic aerial survey. Crane groups located opportunistically were <br />combined with the systematic locations and analyzed together. All analyses were conducted <br />using crane groups as the sample unit, because of the inherent dependence among cranes <br />migrating as a group. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.