My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Whooping Crane Migrational Habitat Use Draft (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Whooping Crane Migrational Habitat Use Draft (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:37:13 PM
Creation date
6/3/2009 9:41:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.100
Description
Adaptive Management Workgroup
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
8/6/2008
Author
Shay Howlin, Clayton Derby, Dale Strickland, Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc.
Title
Whooping Crane Migrational Habitat Use Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Figure 11. Known movements of crane group 06A-03 across the three days of observation. ..... 30 <br />Figure 12. Known movements of crane group 06A-05 across the two days of observation. ....... 30 <br />Figure 13. Known movements of crane group 06A-01 and 02 across the two days of observation. <br />........................................................................................................................................... 30 <br />Figure 14. Known movements of crane group 06B-22 across the thirteen days of observation.. 30 <br />Figure 15. Close up of known movements of crane group 06B-22 across the thirteen days of <br />observation . ....................................................................................................................... 30 <br />Figure 16. Trend in the index of use (closed circles and solid line) and the adjusted index of use <br />(open circles and dashed line) through the Cooperative Agreement time period ............. 31 <br />Figure 17. Trend in the peak winter count of the Aransas-Wood Buffalo population (closed <br />circles and solid line) and the adjusted number of crane groups (open circles and dashed <br />line) in the study area through the Cooperative Agreement time period .......................... 32 <br />Figure 18. Predicted relative probability of selection of the study area by whooping crane groups <br />based on the model for study area selection of land cover. Dark red areas represent areas <br />with high probability of use while light red areas represent areas with low probability of <br />use . .................................................................................................................................... 33 <br />Figure 19. Predicted relative probability of in-channel selection by whooping crane groups based <br />on the model for in-channel selection of land cover. Dark red areas represent areas with <br />high probability of use while light red areas represent areas with low probability of use 34 <br />Figure 20. Predicted quadratic relationship between the relative probability of use and distance to <br />shrub/forest (meters) based on the resource selection function for study area selection of <br />land cover for in-channel observations ............................................................................. 35 <br />Figure 21. Predicted quadratic relationship between the relative probability of use and distance to <br />transportation (meters) based on the resource selection function based on the final <br />resource selection function for local area selection of land cover for in-channel <br />observations . ..................................................................................................................... 35 <br />Figure 22. Predicted quadratic relationship between the relative probability of use and <br />obstruction to obstruction width (meters) based on the resource selection function for <br />characteristics measured on the ground . ........................................................................... 36 <br />Figure 23. Predicted quadratic relationship between the relative probability of use and wetted <br />width (meters) based on the resource selection function for study area selection............ 36 <br />Figure 24. Predicted relative probability of selection of the in-channel area by whooping crane <br />groups at low flow (250cfs at Kearney, NE) based on the model for selection of flow <br />dependent characteristics. Dark red areas represent areas with high probability of use <br />while light red areas represent areas with low probability of use. Available data for this <br />analysis only extended from river mile 157 to river mile 239 .......................................... 37 <br />Figure 25. Predicted relative probability of selection of the in-channel area by whooping crane <br />groups at medium flow (350cfs at Kearney, NE) based on the model for selection of flow <br />dependent characteristics. Dark red areas represent areas with high probability of use <br />while light red areas represent areas with low probability of use. Available data for this <br />analysis only extended from river mile 157 to river mile 239 .......................................... 38 <br />Figure 26. Predicted relative probability of selection of the in-channel area by whooping crane <br />groups at high flow (786cfs at Kearney, NE) based on the model for selection of flow <br />dependent characteristics. Dark red areas represent areas with high probability of use <br />while light red areas represent areas with low probability of use. Available data for this <br />analysis only extended from river mile 157 to river mile 239 .......................................... 39 <br />iii
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.