My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Whooping Crane Migrational Habitat Use Draft (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Whooping Crane Migrational Habitat Use Draft (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:37:13 PM
Creation date
6/3/2009 9:41:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.100
Description
Adaptive Management Workgroup
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
8/6/2008
Author
Shay Howlin, Clayton Derby, Dale Strickland, Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc.
Title
Whooping Crane Migrational Habitat Use Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
W(x) = exp[-7.319 + (2.028*P_OW) + (0.067*P_WC) + (0.055*P_AG) + (0.003*trdist) + <br />(0.0393*sfdist) - (0.001* sfdist2)] <br />The standard errors for the coefficients were 1.04, 0.52, 0.02, 0.01,< 0.01, 0.01, and <0.01 for the <br />intercept, percent of open water, the percent of wetted channel, the percent of agriculture, <br />transportation distance, linear effect of shrub and forest distance, and the quadratic effect of <br />shrub and forest distance respectively. This model indicated significant selection for in-channel <br />areas with large proportions of open water, wetted channel, and agriculture. There was an <br />increased relative probability of selection for areas far from transportation features, and the <br />relative probability of selection increased for large distances to shrub and forest with the rate of <br />increase slowing as the distances to shrub and forest reached the largest values in the dataset <br />(Figure 20). <br />Local area selection of land cover <br />The final resource selection model, w(x), for all observations (wetted channel and upland) <br />contained the linear effects of percent of wetted channel within 0.25 miles (P_WC), percent of <br />open water within 0.25 miles (P_OW), and indicators for wetted channel and agriculture. The <br />form of the final model for wetted channel was: <br />W(x) = exp [2.496 + (0.124*P_WC) + (1.371*P_OW)] <br />The standard errors for the coefficients were 0.49, 0.02, and 0.14 for wetted channel indicator, <br />percent wetted channel, and percent of open water respectively. The form of the final model for <br />agriculture was: <br />W(x) = exp [2.449 + (0.124*P_WC) + (1.371 *P_OW)] <br />The standard errors for the coefficients were 0.60, 0.02, and 0.14 for agriculture indicator, <br />percent wetted channel, and percent of open water respectively. And the form of the final model <br />for all other land cover types was: <br />W(x) = exp [(0.124*P_WC) + (1.371*P_OW)] <br />The standard errors for the coefficients were 0.02, and 0.14 for percent wetted channel, and <br />percent of open water respectively. This model indicated significant selection for local areas with <br />large proportions of wetted channel and open water, as well as for the wetted channel and <br />agriculture cover types. <br />Local in-channel selection of land cover <br />The final resource selection model, w(x), for in-channel selection contained the linear effects of <br />percent of open water within 0.25 miles (P_OW), percent of wetted channel within 0.25 miles <br />(P_WC), and the linear and quadratic effects of distance to transportation (trdist). The form of <br />the final model was: <br />W(x) = exp(3.367*P_OW) + (0.121 *P_WC) - (0.005*trdist) + (0.001 *trdist_2) <br />13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.