My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Water Management Study: Phase 1 Report
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Water Management Study: Phase 1 Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:37:12 PM
Creation date
6/2/2009 12:32:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.100
Description
Adaptive Management Workgroup
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
1/29/2008
Author
Boyle Engineering, Ecological Resource Consultants, BBC Research & Consulting, Lytle Water Solutions
Title
Water Management Study: Phase 1 Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Platte, but these are small compared to the required release from Lake McConaughy. <br />Shortages occur on individual days due to system capacity constraints. Shortages are <br />typically a result of: <br />• North Platte River capacity at North Platte - The modeled capacity of 3,000 cfs at <br />this location on the North Platte limits the release to the river from Lake <br />McConaughy. <br />• North Platte River below Keystone ramping limitation - this ramping rate <br />typically limits releases from Lake McConaughy when diversions at Keystone are <br />changed based on downstream limits or historical operations. <br />• Capacity and ramping rates of the Keystone Diversion, capacity in Sutherland <br />Canal, and capacity and ramping rates at the North Platte Hydro Return - the flow <br />diverted at the Keystone Diversion is influenced by the capacities and historical <br />flows at all three of these locations. On occasion, one, two, or all three can limit <br />the amount of Program water able to return to the South Platte River, <br />circumventing the choke point on the North Platte River. <br />These limitations to target flows vary from year to year and within the same year being <br />analyzed. <br />There are instances during the irrigation season of some years when flows in the river <br />exceed flood stage limits due to historical flows. The occurrence of these events near the <br />downstream end of the system are difficult to incorporate into the release determination <br />for achieving the 800 cfs target. These events are infrequent and do not appear to <br />represent a significant impact on the volume of EA water released. Refinement of this <br />capacity limitation will potentially be addressed in Phase II as part of routing tool <br />refinements. <br />4.0 PROJECT ASSESSMENT <br />The Platte River Water Conservation/Supply Study (Boyle, 1999) and Reconnaissance-Level <br />Water Action Plan (Boyle, 2000) provided supporting information for the Governance <br />Committee to select a package of thirteen alternatives to reduce average annual shortages to <br />B0VLE Page 38 of 58 January 29, 2008 <br />PRRIP - Draft Water Management Study, Phase I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.