My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Fish Population Studies 2007
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Fish Population Studies 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:37:10 PM
Creation date
6/2/2009 12:06:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.100
Description
Adaptive Management Workgroup
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
Jim Jenniges, Mark Peyton
Title
Fish Population Studies 2007
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br />An analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Zarr 1984) showed no significant difference in the mean <br />number of fish caught per seines between study sites in 2007 (Appendix C). Only one site <br />Overton has a significant difference in the mean number of fish caught per siene in any of the <br />years with a Tukey pairwise comparison showing a significantly larger number of fish caught in <br />2003 than in 1999. Neither 2003 nor 1999 is significantly different from 2005 and 2007 at the <br />Overton Site. When all sites are combined there is no significant difference in number of fish <br />caught between years. While there was no statistically significant difference between sites and <br />only one difference between years there were large differences in the number of fish estimated <br />(Table 2). <br />Fish availability for least tern forage may be examined in two manners one is density of fish in <br />the open water areas where terns forage. However, fish per acre does not estimate the total <br />number of fish within a given reach of river due to varying amounts of open water that is <br />dependent on channel width. Therefore we have calculated both fish per acre of open water and <br />number of fish within the open water area of each study site (Table 3). In 2007 the highest fish <br />densities (Figure 1) occurred at Overton while the highest total number of fish was found at the <br />Alda site(Figure 2). Lexington and the Cottonwood Ranch sites had very low numbers of fish <br />(Table 3). <br />A comparison of fish abundance in open water at sites between 1999, 2003 and 2005 (Figure 7) <br />where data from all sites was pooled showed no significant difference at any individual site. Due <br />to the lack of statistical significance it may be possible to combine all sites and get an average <br />fish per mile estimate (Table 4) that would be a reasonable estimate of total fish in the central <br />Platte River. <br />A total of 33 fish species have been identified in the three years of this study. In 1999, 2003 and <br />2005 there were twenty-six, twenty-six and twenty-four species of fish captured respectively <br />(Table 5). In 2007 there were twenty two species collected. The most notable differences in <br />diversity are not in the presence or absence of species which are rare in the Platte River such as <br />orangespotted sunfish, but in the composition of the most common species. Six species (red <br />shiners, sand shiners, bigmouth shiners, brassy minnow, plains killifish and mosquitofish) in <br />every year made up 75% to over 90% (Figure 8) of all fish caught. However, the proportion that <br />each species contributed in any given year varied greatly. <br />Discussion <br />The objective of this study is to look at fish abundance and thus some measure of forage <br />availability for least terns, not at the microhabitat features or the biology that cause swings in <br />species richness or diversity. All of the six most common species are of an appropriate size for <br />least tern forage fish. All six species also utilize shallow water habitats and thus may be <br />susceptible to tern predation. The estimates of the number of fish in the system vary by 2.5 times <br />with 2007 being the lowest population estimate. However, there is no significant difference in <br />the estimated number of fish between years. The large differences in the actual number of fish <br />caught at the different sites also did not result in statistically different populations. While no <br />conclusions are drawn in this report about the decline or increase in fish populations due to the <br />lack of significance it was obvious to the field personnel that either the fish populations in the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.