Laserfiche WebLink
Example Figure 2 <br />Potential for Conflict Index Curve for Upper Crooked River, Washington, USA <br />very <br />acceptable 3 <br /> um <br />o <br />ti <br />2 p <br />m <br />2a00 cfs <br />> 1 Minimum ? Maximum <br />4600 cfs <br />. ,? <br />-- 1400 cfs <br />. <br />? neutral <br />a <br />? Range of Tolerable F1ows <br /> 1400 - 4600cfs <br />U _1 <br /> ? <br />Q <br />-2 <br /> ? <br />very <br />t <br />bl ? <br />unaccep <br />a <br />6 5M 1oM 19N zM 25N 3M 36M MM 15M 5eM <br />Level of Flow (CFS) <br />2. Comparative impact acceptability curve analysis between river stretches that have <br />a common take-out or put-in (i.e. are contiguous). <br />Example Figure 3 <br />Upper and Lower Crooked River Impact Acceptability Curves <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />? <br />a <br />a <br />a <br />? <br />? <br />e <br />-i <br />z <br />3 <br />50 200 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 3000 3900 4600 <br />Flovv LEVeI (CT5)