Laserfiche WebLink
PRRIP - ED OFFICE FINAL 07/16/2008 <br />133 needs to be updated to identify alternatives to meet 25,000 acre-feet of reduction in shortages to <br />134 target flows. To date, Program water activities have primarily been focused on the pulse flow. <br />135 Some of the alternatives identified in Phase II of the Water Management Study could contribute <br />136 to either a pulse and/ar deficit to target flows. Jerry Kenny suggested that the Program could <br />137 achieve efficiency by amending Boyle's contract to move forward with the Water Action Plan <br />138 update, incorporating information gained during Phase II of the Water Management Study <br />139 (WMS). Jerry is not asking for approval to amend the contract now, but would like the WAC to <br />140 think about it and advise Jerry how to proceed with getting the Water Action Plan updates <br />141 completed by the end of next year. Jerry will be make a specific proposal and request to the <br />142 WAC in the upcoming months. <br />143 <br />144 Jon Altenhofen noted that there is risk in focusing too much on the pulse flow when development <br />145 of the Program and milestones (measures of success) was focused on the target flows and the <br />146 milestones. Mike Besson indicated that he thought the GC had said the pulse flows could be <br />147 credited toward meeting target flows. Mike Drain recalled that during development of the <br />148 Cooperative Agreement, it was determined that credit would be given toward the purpose for <br />149 which the project was designed. However, he questioned how that would apply to a new project <br />150 designed primarily to meet pulse flows and not other target flows. Frank Kwapnioski asked <br />151 Boyle to consider how the WMS Phase II alternatives could be credited toward both objectives. <br />152 Blaine Dwyer indicated that this will be forthcoming in the workshop following this meeting. <br />153 <br />154 The WAC discussed election of a Chairperson for the upcoming period of August 2008 through <br />155 July 2009. Kent Miller nominated Frank Kwapnioski and Jon Altenhofen seconded the <br />156 motion. Frank agreed and the committee thanked him for his continued dedication. <br />157 <br />158 The future WAC meeting schedule was discussed. To date, a recurring meeting schedule has not <br />159 been established, however water-related activities are ramping up and need for WAC <br />160 involvement is increasing. The ED's Office recommends establishing a standing WAC meeting <br />161 schedule (meetings could be canceled in advance if not needed). The committee agreed to <br />162 schedule a recurring meeting for months offset from the GC meetings and far enough in advance <br />163 of the GC meetings to provide input to the GC, with interim conference calls determined on an <br />164 as-needed basis. The ED's Office will circulate an email with suggested schedule and locations. <br />165 <br />166 The WAC meeting adjourned at 9:05 a.m. for the WMS Phase II Alternatives Screening <br />167 Workshop. <br />168 <br />169 Water Management Study Phase II Alternatives Screening Workshop (WAC Reconvened) <br />170 <br />171 The previous WMS Phase II Workshop in May, 2008 identified 23 major alternatives that could <br />172 be used to contribute to the Program's flow objectives of a Pulse Flow, Summer Flow, and <br />173 reduction to the Average Annual Shortages to Target Flows. The goal of the workshop today is <br />174 to select three alternatives to carry forward in a more detailed, reconnaissance-level evaluation. <br />175 The focus of Phase II is the Pulse Flow, but contributions to other target flows were also <br />176 identified. <br />Page 4 of 5