My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Compacts, Decrees, and Treaties Affecting CO's Water
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Compacts, Decrees, and Treaties Affecting CO's Water
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:36:53 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 2:00:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.350
Description
Legislation
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
CWCB
Title
Compacts, Decrees, and Treaties Affecting CO's Water
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Article VI <br />The Commission shall determine the quantity of the con- <br />sumptive use of water, which use is aPportioned by Article III <br />hereof, for the Upper Basir. and for each State of the Upper <br />Basin by the inflow-outfZow method in terms of man-ma.de <br />depletions of the virgin flow at Lee Ferry, unless the Com- <br />mission, by unanimous action, shall adopt a different method <br />of determination. <br />Article VIi <br />The consumptive use of water by the United States of <br />America or any of its agencies, instrumentalities or wards <br />shall be charged as a use by the State in which the use is <br />made; provided, that such consuaptive use incident to the <br />diversion, impounding, or conveyance of water in one State <br />for use in another shall be charged to such latter State. <br />5. <br />Colorado Ri.ver Storage Project Act <br />Lilce all western rivers, the annua.l flows of the Colorado <br />River are highly erratic. In recent history, the annual flow of <br />the river at Lee Ferry has fZuctuated from a high of about 23 <br />million acre-feet to a low of about 5.6 million acre-feet. With- <br />out holdover storage above Lee Ferry, there have been years in <br />which no water would be available to the Upper Basin if a delivery <br />of 75,000,000 acre-feet in every consecutive ten-year period were <br />made at Lee Ferry. This fact was fully recognized when the Colo- <br />rado River Compact was negotiated in 1922. The solution discussed <br />during the compact deliberations was the construction of a-major reservoir or reservoirs above Lee Ferry which would Chen permit a <br />relativeiy equalized annual flow at Lee Ferry. <br />In addition to the problem of making the specified Lee Ferry <br />water deliveries, the Upper Basin was faced with a ma,jor financial <br />task of financing Upper Basin projects which would permit that <br />basin to utilize its apportioned share of water. After the signing <br />of the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact in 1948, the unified <br />Upper Basin states began a concerted effort to obtain congressional <br />suthorization of Iegislation which would make it possible for the <br />Upper Basin states to utilize the total water supply allocated to <br />that basin by the Colorado River Compact. The result was the <br />enactment of the Colorado River Storage Project Act in 1956. <br />Ear1y in the game it was perceived that the <br />need considerable financial assistance if it were <br />waters apportioned to it. Since Iarge reservoirs <br />of generating considerable electrical energy, the <br />to the financial probZem was an apportionment of <br />Upper Basin would <br />to develap the <br />have the capability <br />obvious solution <br />power revenues <br />-10-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.