My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Compacts, Decrees, and Treaties Affecting CO's Water
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Compacts, Decrees, and Treaties Affecting CO's Water
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:36:53 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 2:00:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.350
Description
Legislation
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
CWCB
Title
Compacts, Decrees, and Treaties Affecting CO's Water
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
At this time the State of CaZifornia was already vigorously <br />pressing Congress for authorization of a federally financed <br />lower basin projecC on the Colorado River. As the result of <br />the t omin vs. Colorado decision, the upper basin states caere <br />now open y hosti e to t e construction of storage or diversion <br />facilities on the lower river that would giace that area in a <br />position to mononolize the waters of the river through prior <br />appropriation. It therefore did not appear possibZe thaC <br />Congress wculd approve lower basin projects caithout an'ud?quate <br />g uarantee tha? the water resources of the upper basin would <br />ave some protection. In such a climate, the Colorado River <br />Compact Comuission, authorized by Congress the previous year, <br />began its deliberations in January of 1922. The Commission was <br />chaired by Herbert Hoover, representing the United States. <br />It soon became obvious that no division of water among the <br />respective seven states could ever be accomplished. Agreement <br />was then reached that the utaters of the Colorado River and <br />its tributaries wouZd be aDportioned between the "Upper Basin" <br />(Colorado, WyOmiIIgy and parts oi New Mexico, Utah and Arizona), <br />and "Lower Basin`1 (California, Nevada and parts of Utah, New <br />Nlexico, and Arizona). <br />However, the Commission then became deadlocked on the <br />question of how much water each basin was to receive. A handy <br />solution was provided by the Bureau of Reclamation, which had <br />made studies to determine the possible future water require- <br />ments of each basin. The requirements of the Upper Basin were <br />figured at 6,500,000 acre-feet of water annually. The require- <br />ments of the Lower Basin from the main stem of the Colorado <br />River were estimated at 5,100,000 acre-feet. ihe total future <br />consumptive use of water from the Gila Ri.ver in Arizona was <br />computed at 2,350,000 acre-feet. This latter sum, when added <br />to the 5,100,000 from the main stem of the Colorado, came to <br />7,450,000 acre-feet. This figure was rounded out at 7,500,000 <br />acre-feet. <br />The situation at this point was that the toCal Upper Basin <br />present and future requirements were computed at 6,500,000 <br />acre-feet of water annually, and the Lower Basin requirements, <br />includin the Gila River, were computed at 7,500,000 acre-feet <br />annua . Since over % of the Colorado River flow originates <br />in the 'Upper Division" states (Colorado, 1Vew riexico, Utah and <br />Wyoming),'the Upper Division commissioners werP hardly in a <br />position to return home and ir.form their people that they had <br />bargained away over half of the Colorado River to the Lower <br />Basin. <br />At this point, a happy compromise almost <br />effect that the Upper Basin should be allowed <br />acre-feet of water in order ta bring its total <br />the same figure agreed on for the Lower Basin. <br />occurred to the <br />another million <br />allocation to <br />The result would <br />-4-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.