Laserfiche WebLink
S'Ign the atte deal <br />:111thre'e-state Gov. Dave Hei- 3-state <br />neman . signs a recogni <br />Platte Riy,er agreement, in of river's <br />thei?works for years, it not j <br />is4??said that 1Vebraslca the bi <br />wi'll'have surrendered <br />to Gro' x?d <br />"f"orces who seek "to ,? <br />drag us back into the irrigators <br />19tiYit century. pre-de- be ma?le-i <br />delbpinent era." So . <br />waxns a spokesman for.a group, of <br />gx,o?yndwater irrigators. <br />.;Toj analyze this extravagant pre- <br />diGt'ion by Nebraskans Ia'irst Exe4u- , <br />tive Dixector pon Adams - and;to see the logic Por why Heineman <br />should sign the Platte River Recov- <br />ery Implenientation Plan - let's <br />look at a litYle history. tiD:'uelopment of the Pl?atta has <br />nu;u.ex 'been solely a Nebraska af- <br />fair. As' previously noted in this <br />space, the oldest surface-water <br />rights in the Flatte basin are held in <br />Colora:do, dating to 1859. ? <br />Some way was needed for all the , <br />people tappinb afertile river in.an <br />arid region to share it. Thus the <br />pxixiciple ol' t'irst in time, first in <br />right: ??roperties wl?ere Platte yva- <br />ter 1'irst was used have first call.: <br />Latex, peoplc discovered an im- <br />mense pool oF water below the <br />praxxie. Lven as the great dams and <br />irrzg? ?:ion carials. develaped on the <br />Nort? Platte in the early 1900s ' <br />grounowatex wells were sprouting <br />down?tream. 1?eople tl?ot?ght the groundwater <br />was a?n extra, water source., But.it <br />zsn't: The waters below are linlced <br />to the waters above.'Therein lies 'a . <br />rcality liiat Nebraslza didn't even <br />aclci?.owledge legally unti11996. That irrigation is gold for Ne- <br />braslza is Ueyond dispute. So is the <br />econoxnic pain a rollbaclc would' <br />br?iig, But this drought has rein- <br />forceci hydrplogical truth. Anyone <br />, who,;dz•ives Interstate 80 can see it. <br />?']?;e;?.Platte lias gone all, but d?:?y <br />for periods •near Grand Island'but, <br />cont?ir?ues.toflow riear riyer' s end <br />soutb? of Onrzaha. But for the inflows. <br />frqzn the Llkhorn and Loup IZiyer <br />sy5t, 6ms - largely, fed by ground-, <br />• wat,?r under the Sand Hills - the <br />Platte wouTd Ue dry there, too. <br />Irrigation wells and center pivots <br />havel spread up and down the Platte <br />s3?"stem. (Cities. are making greater <br />use'of the.river, too, but their share <br />ox''ii- Sage pales Uefore that of agri- <br />cilXture.) All this pumping -has <br />pl,a,'y,:ed a part in drying up the cen- <br />tra? 'Platte and turning upstream : <br />La1ze.McConaughy irrto Little Mac. <br />s??zad then there are the birds. The. <br />lastc;:major drougYit, around 1990, <br />was +aUout the tiine environmental- <br />ists izzsisted that endangered bird <br />species along the central Platte, in <br />essence, liad federal water rights <br />pred`ating. even white settleme'nt. <br />„',Cliat was when the federal gov- <br />e?nrj?ient ordered water to be re- <br />leasc?d from Kingsley Dam - in the <br />mic?s;t of tYiat droubht - to aid the <br />bir:cls. 1'l?at unhappy inemory -has <br />U.een tapped Uy groups s.uch as Ne- <br />brasizans I?'irst ever since. . <br />-''Tkiey ignore one tliizlg, hawever <br />-='a'good 15 years ol work by lead- <br />ers``in this region to convince :fed- <br />cr?zl ;regulators that the Platte :can- <br />not;lie managed for the birds' laene- <br />fi?,alpne. <br />. ?'l?e first Platte River agree- <br />mnn? inlrrl i?n 1007 nnmm'itfor1 fhn <br />accord federal government, zes a11 Nebraska, Colorado <br />and. Wyoming to do <br />us.ers, what can be done for <br />ust central Platte, wildlife <br />rds. . without drying up. <br />water lakes, shutting off faucets to cities ' or <br />canxaot turning off irrigatiori . <br />mmune. Wells that existed. in <br />that year. <br />The pending deal; which incorpo- <br />rates the first one, essentially up- <br />holds first-in-time, :first-in-right as <br />the faipest way to allocate the riv- <br />er. The. parties have cooperated <br />reasonably well. Even. the federal <br />regulators have refrained from us- <br />ing their. Big Mac,water.right.un-.. . <br />der.the prelim?inar.y accord as.this <br />drought: goes on. ? <br />iBut-?dreds of wells. servine <br />some ??u,uuu acres were ar.iiiea m <br />the tPlatte li ' a ter <br />s ate agreement stressed that " <br />there ought not.be any mor.e. ; <br />The final agreement requires <br />little of Nebraska that it 'liadn't <br />agreed to 10 years ago. But it does <br />call on the state to make up for <br />what those extra wells are. taking <br />and will take away from the river. <br />The state already resolved to roll. <br />back irrigation in overtaxed river <br />basins when, Legislative Bill 962 <br />was enacted in 2004. It was largely <br />because Heineman wanted to de- <br />ter.mine whether the Platte R'iver <br />agreennent would greatly add to <br />that burden that the :parties'are <br />1ike1y to delay its, signmg deadline. <br />frozn.Oct.1 to Dec. 31. <br />New,-cost estimates from .the Ne- <br />bras.ka Department of NaturaL Re- <br />-sources p,eg the rough cost to idle <br />or retire post-1997 irrigated acres <br />due to the Platte agreement at $8 <br />million to $11 million. $ut that <br />cpmpares with an overall estimate <br />of up to $90 million to curtail irri- <br />gation in the basin under LB 962. <br />When, Adams, of Nebraskans ' <br />Fir.st, offered his doomsday sce- <br />nario last,week in Gering, wes.tern ` <br />Nebraska supporters of the Platte <br />River deal raised a differerit possi- <br />. bilify: With no deal, federal regula- <br />tors,could:order nearly three times <br />as much water as they now hold in <br />1VIcConaughy to head straight <br />downstream from Wyoming to the <br />central Platte to help the birds. <br />Just how would that be good for <br />Nebraska agrictilture? . <br />The proposed agreement, in oth-. <br />er. words, would give Nebraska a <br />chance to pursue habitat-promo- .. <br />tion methods that would require <br />far less water than wliat the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service would <br />otherwise require.. . <br />Some Nebraska. irrigators seem <br />to persist in intellectual denial that <br />what they pump from under the <br />ground can draw down their riv- <br />ers. It's likely that many more are <br />in economic denial: They know the <br />truth but ?are too deeply invested in <br />their wells not to fight for them. -: <br />' J3ut the Midlands indeed cannot <br />go • back to the 1850s.. The birds, <br />ditch, and pivot irrigators, power <br />gerierators, communities; hunters, anglers, boaters, sunbathers and <br />ecotourists have no choice but to <br />liVe together and:share the river. <br />The Platte River agreement does <br />,that as fairly .as seems possible. <br />Heineman should keep N.ebraska's nnmmi+monfonFl cinn fliio ?col • <br />? <br />V v ?r',?'?1 , <br />' Av <br />r--/ <br />y,? ?.n. t?r?'?e-? CAf <br />L ? <br />? x