My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Problems with a Two-State Agreement
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Problems with a Two-State Agreement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:36:45 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 10:10:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.350
Description
Legislation
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
Unknown
Title
Problems with a Two-State Agreement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
water projects in all three states, but just two projects in Colorado: Tamarack I and <br />Tamarack III. In a Water Action Plan designed to provide 130,000 to 150,000 acre feet of <br />benefit at the habitat, Tamarack I(about 10,000 acre feet) and Tamarack III (17,000 AF) <br />would provide about 20°10 of the 136,000 acre feet of water benefit in the three-state <br />water plan. Removing these two projects from the Program, while retaining the <br />remaining projects in Nebraska and Wyoming, would leave two initial water projects (the <br />Environmental Account at Lake McConaughy and the Pathfinder Project in Wyoming) <br />plus a scaled-back Water Action Plan, with a total of about 109,000 acre feet of water <br />benefit measured at the habitat.3 <br />This substantial reduction in the water available to the Proposed Program is <br />unacceptable. Conservation groups and the Department of Interiar have already <br />compromised substantially from the 417,000 acre feet of water that the FWS says is <br />needed to restare and maintain the habitat. To reduce the current Program goal even <br />further, without any assurances that the difference would be met through outside <br />processes covering Colorado projects, would put the species even more at risk. <br />The estimated cost of the three-state version of the Water Action Plan is a range <br />from $37 million to $69 million, and the current Proposed Program budget includes $45 <br />million for the Water Action Plan, plus $17 million for the initial three water projects. <br />Subtracting the estimates for the two Tamarack projects (about $12 million for Tamarack <br />I and III) would result in a total water cost of about $51 million. <br />Mac EA plus Pathfinder (70,000 AF) <br />Water Action Plan (43 KAF) <br />Permitting <br />Subtotal Water Section <br />Proposed Prgm NE/WY Share <br />$ 17 m $ 12 m <br />$45m $38m <br />$ 1m $ lm <br />$63m $51 m <br />Land Action Plan <br />The Land Action Plan in the 3-state CA contemplates the protection and <br />management of 10,000 acres of habitat, including the 2,650 acre Cottonwood Ranch in <br />Nebraska. A commitment for just 60% of that land would result in a 6,000 acre Land <br />Action Plan. Based on the current CA budget, the budget for a 6,000 acre Land Action <br />Plan would be approximately as follows: <br /> 10,000 Acres 6,000 Acres <br />Cottonwood $ 5.3 m $ 5.3 m <br />New Acquis. $14.0 m $ 6.4 m <br />M&O $ 6.3m $3.8m <br />Investigation $ 3.6 m $ 3.6 m <br />Taxes $ 1.1 m $ 0.7 m <br />Permit/LAC $ 1.0 m $ 0.6 m <br />3 These are rough estimates. The projects in the Water Action Plan were assessed at a reconnaissance level <br />so they are estimations, and changing the mix of projects can change the expected yield of other projects <br />because many of them rely on the same sources of water. <br />Draft - June 3 version - Draft
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.