My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Check list of AM steps
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Check list of AM steps
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:36:32 PM
Creation date
5/29/2009 9:24:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.100
Description
Adaptive Management Workgroup (PRRIP)
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
Unknown
Title
Check list of AM steps
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table X. Check list of AM steps and associated elements completed in Platte River so far. Table <br />adapted tiom Marnlorek et aL (2006). <br />F""""" ID measurable indicators Y <br /> ID spatial 1 temporal bounds Y <br />(AMP) ID key uncertainties Y <br /> Articulate hypotheses to be tested Y!1!! <br /> Build conceptual models Y <br /> Expliciqy stale assumplions partly <br /> Involve stakeholders Y <br /> Involve scientists Y <br /> Involve managers Y <br /> Reports describing this slep Y <br />?lep Z Cesign Aclive APO considered, nul ycl pianned <br /> Conlrast, replication, controls considered, not yet planned <br />(Wak Plans StatlsGcal advice some received, much more required <br />with Mgmt, Predict outcomes Y, need lo quantify <br />Moniloring & Consider next steps under allernaUve outcomes needs more work on decision rules <br />Research) Dala management plan Y, but may change <br /> Monitoring plan Some elQments lhere, much mae needed <br /> Formal AM Woric Plan Conceptually complete, experimental design needed <br /> Peer review of design ProtoCOls reviewed, overall monitaing plan not yet <br /> Multi-year budget commitments Y <br /> Involve slakeholders Y <br />Step 3. Implemenled as designed Some pl?ot actions implemented (e.g. Cottonwood) <br />Implementacion Effectiveness monitoring Some pilot monitoring <br />Siep 4 Conlrasting treatmenis <br />Monitoring Implemented as designed <br />Im <br />lementation monitorin <br /> <br />Step 5. p <br />y <br />Monitoring resulfs compared against goals/objecOves <br />Evaluation of Monitoring results compared against assumplions, <br />results uncertainties, hypotheses <br /> Compare actual results against model predictions <br /> Receive stalistical or analysis advice <br /> Data analysis keeps up with data generalion from <br /> monitoring aclivilies <br />Step 6 Meaningful Icarrung uccuired <br />Adjustrre,nt I This was communicaled to decision makers <br />Revision o( Actions or instruments changed based on learning <br />Hypotheses <br />and <br />Manaaement
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.