My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Organizing for Endangered and Threatened Species Habitat Draft
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Organizing for Endangered and Threatened Species Habitat Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:36:29 PM
Creation date
5/28/2009 1:12:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.100
Description
Adaptive Management Workgroup (PRRIP)
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
David M. Freeman, Ph.D,, Annie Epperson and Troy Lepper
Title
Organizing for Endangered and Threatened Species Habitat Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PART II SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRISIS <br />CHA-PTER THREE: <br />GETTING INTO THE FEDERAL NEXUS <br />"...all great values of this territory have ultimately to be measured to you in acre feet" <br />John Wesley Powell, speaking at the Montana <br />Constitutional Constitution in 1889, (Peirce 1972). <br />0 Degraded habitat for three birds-whooping cranes, piping plovers, and least terns--was <br />? intimately linked to the construction of Platte basin water facilities, most especially large dams, <br />? reservoirs, and diversions. The Endangered Species Act of 1973 would force a confrontation <br />, between activities of water users in the basin and the needs of three birds listed under that law. <br />• The ESA has compelled a sustained twenty-seven year conversation about how to reconcile <br />human water work with needs of the listed birds. <br />Two Traditions <br />The American west has always been a major federal project. The federal government has <br />been the purveyor of cheap homesteads, subsidizer of railroads and highways, investor in military <br />facilities, promoter of irrigation, builder of the Panama canal, fighter of native Americans, <br />provider of reservations for native Americans, organizer of grazing resources, steward and restorer <br />of soils beginning with the great "blow-out of the 1930's, and manager of parks and forests. It is, <br />in the eleven westernmost states (of the lower 48) by far the largest landowner. Federal agencies <br />own almost half of the 17 Western states as compared to eastern states that have been <br />overwhelmingly privatized in their landholdings. Nevada has the highest proportion of land <br />under federal ownership (82.9%), Wyoming is 48.9°io federally owned, Colorado (36.3%), but <br />Nebraska contains only 1.4% federal land (Riebsame and Robb 1997: 58). <br />? Significant federal presence in the West has always meant close relationships among <br />? federal, state, and local natural resource interests but in the 1960's-1970's, the rules that governed <br />? the relationship drastically changed. <br />For decades, the Bureau of Reclamation was promoted by its powerful constituencies as a <br />force for progress by advancing the story of the small struggling community starved for essential <br />services-educational, religious, health, commercial, and financial-transformed into a thriving <br />population center by a bureau dam. In the early years of the twentieth century, the U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service served that same vision by attempting to remove those predators that threatened <br />to make the West unsafe for a cow. When the Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) constructed the <br />large dams and reservoirs on the Wyoming's North Platte, and when it built the system of <br />Colorado west and east slope storage reservoirs and a system of pumps and tunnels bringing <br />Colorado river water to the burgeoning populations on the east side, the federal-local vision was <br />utilitarian commodity production. There were no ESA or other environmental mandates to be <br />fulfilled. But, a spate of environmental legislation began to change all that and, most especially <br />14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.