My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Organizing for Endangered and Threatened Species Habitat Draft
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Organizing for Endangered and Threatened Species Habitat Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:36:29 PM
Creation date
5/28/2009 1:12:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.100
Description
Adaptive Management Workgroup (PRRIP)
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
David M. Freeman, Ph.D,, Annie Epperson and Troy Lepper
Title
Organizing for Endangered and Threatened Species Habitat Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Analytically, then, the quesition becomes: how has it happened that a constellation of <br />water user organizations that have emerged over the last 130 years to provide a combination of <br />private benefits (e.g. agriculture/in(iustries), and common property resource benefits (e.g., ditch <br />companies, irrigation districts, mur?icipal water suppliers), and small scale collective goods (e.g., <br />environmental organizations working on modest ecosystem patches), have entered into <br />negotiations with a view toward pnaducing on a larger scale than ever before a collective <br />good/property in the form of specie:s habitat? <br />To produce this new form cif collective property, the players have had to agree to <br />transcend and adapt their particulac• private and common property resource rationalities. They <br />have proposed to invest in creative solutions of their own making to produce a product from <br />which they will not capture any mare benefit than anybody else in the basin, the nation, the <br />world. Like others, they know not the value of a plover, a tern, or a whooping crane. Whatever <br />that value, it is not to be measured in market exchange of private goods. They do know that there <br />is no profit in sustaining these umbrella species, and all the life forms that will flourish with <br />them. They know that to enhance t:he environment, their customers and members will pay a bit <br />more for an acre foot of water and ;a kilowatt hour of electricity. They know that they would not <br />have undertaken to produce this collective good if left alone. They also know that they have <br />been capable of negotiating a new regime of things that will-more than has been the case in the <br />past-come closer to reflecting the true costs that our production and consumption of private <br />goods has placed on the river and other living things that depend on it. They would have to <br />adjust their former organizational rationalities to make room on the rivers of the basin for a new <br />collective agenda. All in all, it is an astounding development-undertaken by virtually no other <br />society--and one well worth investigation. <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.