Laserfiche WebLink
<br />+?. <br />` -$LUMMARY OF IMPACTS <br />CHANNEL ROOSTING HABITAT <br />The Governance Committee, Scenario 2; Water Leasing; and Wet Meadow Alternatives <br />most improve both the amount and the distribution of roost habitat beyond the Present <br />Condition. Improvements are primarily due to mechanical channel manipulation (widening). <br />These three alternatives receive the same amount of island leveling, and the degree of <br />improvement of open channel roost habitat is similar among the three. Among the action <br />alternatives, Governance Committee Alternative, Scenario 1, provides the least improvement <br />in channel roost habitat. It is expected to be comparable to the Present Condition. <br />Insert Not contiguous text <br />Table 5-41.- Changes in Open Channel Area Relative to the Present Condition <br /> Open Channel Greater Than 500 Feet Wide <br />Alternative Acres Change From the Present Condition <br />(Percent) <br />Present Condition 3,017 -- <br />Governance Committee, Scenario 1 3,017 0 <br />Governance Committee, Scenario 2 3,982 +32 <br />Water Leasing 3,982 +32 <br />Wet Meadow 3,982 +32 <br />Water Emphasis 3,651 +21