Laserfiche WebLink
section B.5 above. The parties agree that the supply canal routing requirements <br />recommended by FFRC Staff are not appropria.te and should not be adopted. "' <br />D. Habitat Lands <br />Commitments: AIP, Section A; AAI Modifications/Additions, Secnon D <br />1. ProQram Habitat Lands <br />Commitment.• AIP, Secrion N.A; AAI, Modifccations/Additions <br />FERC's Preferred Alternative in the RDIIS called for the <br />Districts to acquire and develop 8484 acres of habitat in four complexes between <br />Lexington and Chapman, Nebraska, 'g developed in a manner consistent with USFWS' <br />recommendations early in this proceeding. "9 Those USFWS recommendations also <br />serve as the basis for defining the habitat component of the first increment of the <br />Proposed Program - 10,000 acres in habitat complexes in the I.exington to Chapman <br />reach.180 Over the long term, the objective of the Proposed Program is 29,000 acres <br />dedicated to wildlife use. It is expected that the Pro?ram will coordinate management <br />of lands owned by a variety of entities. l$' Most of the par[ies anticipate that the basin- <br />wide approach wil] achieve a superior result in the Lexing;ton to Chapman reach by <br />combining contributions from the Districts with those from other sources. The value of <br />AIP, section IV.C?.h. <br />"-R RDEIS at 4-90 throuizh 4-91. <br />1-79 DOI, Comments on Application at 9(Nov. 15, 1994). <br />1R0 proposed Program, section III.A.3.b(2). <br />Proposed Program, section III,A.3.a.(2). <br />90