Laserfiche WebLink
PLATTE RIVER RECOVERY IMPLEMENATION PROGRAM <br />Attachment 5 <br />Section 9 <br />COLORADO'S PLAN FOR FUTURE DEPLETIONS' <br />December 7, 2005 <br />Colorado will be responsible for mitigating the impacts of new water related activities in <br />Colorado on the associated habitats, in the manner described below? As part of the proposed <br />Prograim, the mitigation described below shall constitute the means for mitigating new water <br />related activities in Colorado, except for water related activities pursued by entities electing not <br />to participate in the Program. Subject to the planned NEPA and ESA reviews, the DepaRment of <br />the Inte:rior ("DOI") agrees that Colorado's Future Depletions Proposal is a sufficient <br />contribution by Colorado to offset the impacts of new water related activities in the South Platte <br />River E{asin in Colorado. If Colorado implements the mitigation program described below, new <br />water mlated activities in Colorado will not adversely affect the "Cunent Regime of the River," <br />as that term is used in the document entitled "An Environmental Account for Storage Reservoirs <br />in the P'latte River System in Nebraska," (Program Attachment 5, Sectian 5). For purposes of this <br />docume;nt, "new water related activities" shall be used as that term is defined in the Platte River <br />Recovery Implementation Program (Program Document), footnote 3. New water related <br />activitif;s shall not include augmentation for wells existing pre-June 30 1997, provided the <br />augmer.ited wells do not increase irrigated acreage beyond that irrigated on June 30, 1997.3 <br />1 In the C'ooperative Agreement and the Program Draft EIS, the Colorado Plan for Future Depletions was referred to <br />as Tamarack II (Tamarack I?). <br />Z Colorado offers this agreement as part of its efforts to resolve endangered species conflicts through a negotiated <br />and mutually agreed upon basin-wide cooperative agreement and recovery program. Nothing in this agreement <br />constitute:s an admission by Colorado that any depletion to the North or South Platte Rivers or their tributaries in <br />Colorado that have occurred or may in the future occur adversely affect or reduce state line flows. Similarly, <br />Colorado does not admit that any changes in the amount or timing of flows at the ColoradaNebraska or Colorado- <br />Wyoming; state lines that have occurred or may in the future occur reach or adverse(y affect endangered species <br />habitat in Nebraska. This agreement isnot intended, and should not be construed, to amend or modify the South <br />Platte River Compact or any interstate decree, or to waive any rights thereunder. <br />3 Prior to 2003, ground water users in the South Platte River Basin augmented their out-of-priority depletions with <br />administratively approved annual substitute water supply plans. (n 2003, the Colorado General Assembly required <br />these grouind water users to transition to a system of court-approved plans for augmentation. The applications for <br />approval of the court-approved plans for augmentation must be filed with the water court no later than December 31, <br />2005. Tht: courts may need a number of years to approve the proposed plans, during the interim the ground water <br />users witl continue to operate pursuant to administratively approved substitute water supply plans. Because the <br />court-approved plans are permanent , the replacement obligations contained in those plans may be more stringent <br />than those induded in the administratively approved plans. [n order to resolve a potential controversy conceming <br />whether the use of ground water under more stringent terms constitutes an expansion of an existing project, the <br />parties to the Cooperative Agreement, based on the assumption that the court approved augmentation plans will not <br />result in increased consumptive use in Colorado, have agreed that wells in existence prior to June 30, 1997 and the <br />augmentat;ion sources for those wells included in any court-approved plans for augmentation will be deemed <br />existing uses of water and not new water-related activities as long as the augmented wells do not increase irrigated <br />acreage be:yond that irrigated on June 30, 1997. <br />December 7, 2005 Colorado Deplelions P/an <br />?.?