Jul 05 07 01:01p
<br />QA BRIGHTON SfANDARD BiAOF
<br />WATER
<br />(rem page 1 A
<br />linns to [hc WIlcr-suppip cl•isis
<br />facing Fanners and ranchers in
<br />northeastern Colorado, Miller
<br />stepped up to unveil a water
<br />solution plan he's been work-
<br />ing on for decades.
<br />M11iller, a retired Air Force
<br />colonel, is president of Natu-
<br />ral Energy Resources Co. in
<br />Pafiner Lake. Fle said miflions
<br />o( acre•feet of [cderally-owned
<br />water shares are available in
<br />Colorado with no immedia[e
<br />plans to utilize the waterre-
<br />sourceor energ}r whidi could
<br />be produced.
<br />Describing a siiigle, h+gh-
<br />altitude, pumped storage si[e
<br />Uiat would be construcked
<br />in the Gunnison Basin, Milfer
<br />said the project coufd "sub•
<br />stantially increase the produc-
<br />civity of existing renewable
<br />energy and water resources
<br />tltroughout a Hvc river•basin
<br />region."
<br />Optimistic but skepk'scal,
<br />the 40-plus farm families on
<br />hand tor the mec[ing 3t the
<br />Double Tree Ftotel listened in-
<br />tently to Mitler as he described
<br />the Central Colorado Project.
<br />"We tike t4ie idea of being
<br />selF•supporting un the South
<br />Platte," Arnold Good of Fort
<br />Morgan said. "[3ut we're going
<br />to stop short af saying that
<br />that when water is available,
<br />ive shottldn't pursue it."
<br />Water Users Defense
<br />begins battle
<br />fn April, the 'Water Users
<br />Defense Commi[tee asked for
<br />an emergency executive order
<br />tor a rnoratorium on shuY-
<br />downs placed on the farmers'
<br />wells. But Ritter denied the
<br />eroup's request and said the
<br />task force will bring together
<br />all the parties to sCudy the
<br />problem.
<br />"Tliis is a complex problem
<br />that requires a comprehensive
<br />revieiv," Ritter said in April.
<br />"This task force wi{1 bring to-
<br />gether aq stakeholders so we
<br />can explore al{ options."
<br />Bob Sakata, president of
<br />Sakata Farms in Brighton, a
<br />major vegetable producer, said
<br />in April it may be too late Eor
<br />some Farmers. 6ut he praised
<br />Ritter for taking action.
<br />..At Ic:iSY hc'c liiini<ing
<br />aboitt us," SaE;:rta said.
<br />Sen. (3ranclnn Sliaffer, I)-
<br />l.oiigmunl, wiio ;ilsu :il lcnclccl
<br />the Apri! niceting in wiggins,
<br />said thc sCOte izeeds long-terrn
<br />solu[ions lo its water needs.
<br />"The crisis began wlien dle
<br />state suffcred one o[ its worst
<br />droughts in histury beginning
<br />in zooz," Sliaf(er said. "bVlien
<br />South Platte Rivcr levels are
<br />loIv, the Wclls musf bc turned
<br />off Lo ensure that Water users
<br />with highcr•priority rights ge[
<br />their share, since the wells can
<br />affect river levels."
<br />For 30 ycars, tlte stnke
<br />engineer had been able to
<br />juggle the state's water stipply
<br />[o keep farmers happy and the
<br />South PEatte (totiving. [Sut las[
<br />year, die Colorado Supremc
<br />Couri uphcld a 1969 decision
<br />requiring well oivners to put
<br />water back in[o the Sou[h
<br />P!a[te. The courts also ruled
<br />tliat the water courts, nn[.lhe
<br />state enginecr, siiould decide
<br />where the tvater will be used
<br />and by wliom.
<br />The state is flushing
<br />away water
<br />Sayiiig Colorado is iiot
<br />using its water like it sliouEd
<br />be, Miiler pointed out tliat
<br />only 2,3 milliomacrc Ccet of a
<br />potential 3.7 million acre-Feet
<br />in tiie Colorado River hasin is
<br />utilized.l'lie rest simply fluws
<br />out oF the stafe, "T]iere's no
<br />reason Far this crisis," he said.
<br />"We think this is the an-
<br />swcr For Chc wholc sfate and
<br />even the down river states,"
<br />Mitler said. "It we can get the
<br />peopie behind this, we can
<br />relax a little bit and not let
<br />the prior water appropc-iation
<br />system just kill us."
<br />The higher water is stored,
<br />the more oppor[unitics to usc
<br />and reuse the water are pre-
<br />scnted, Miller explained. Ffc
<br />proposes to build the Union
<br />Park Resenoir in west-central
<br />Cotorado, neir Gunnison.
<br />"Tliis Guiuiisan idea, wcbe
<br />been working on for a long
<br />time. Now, we're saying Uy
<br />storing water at high altitude,
<br />we.can muitiply the productiv-
<br />ity, depcnaaUility and quality
<br />of whaterer Finite level uf
<br />water tliis state has."
<br />Union Park would sit on
<br />WEChESCAY, JUNE 13, 2007
<br />p.4
<br />wWW.MElA0wF4FY1. CO+.f
<br />hU\rt THC FIZONT
<br />a sirc xvilhin ;I 30•niilc riidius
<br />of five inajor river drainages.
<br />M11iflcrsaid he didn't hclicvc
<br />Ilicrc was iuothcr in;ijor silc
<br />in Lhc world lhat could ulilize
<br />fivc sepairate drainaSe basins
<br />for oiic wacer system, fx-
<br />pected [o hold no Icss than 1.2
<br />iniilion acre-fect, the reservoir
<br />Would easiip be tlle largest
<br />body of waler in the stata
<br />N1iller said spring rtmo(f
<br />surpluses occur tlic samc limc
<br />surpfus eneroy is available,
<br />essentially (ree. py pwnping
<br />during this luw-pcalc cnergy
<br />pcriod, tlie wafer coulcl be
<br />inoved to sCorage arsd fhen,
<br />when water was recJistributed
<br />t(iroughout Che rest oE the
<br />ycar, Che reverse (low in Che
<br />samc pipeline in(raslructure
<br />coulcl be used to gener'al peak-
<br />needs po+ver.
<br />He anticipates privafe ill-
<br />Justsy would futid fhe projec[
<br />becai:sc of the potential to
<br />generatc peak puwer witti a
<br />return io times wha[ is gcner•
<br />aced by normal, lower-altitude
<br />reservoirs.
<br />"Tliis tivould multipty
<br />tlie procluctivily of cncrgy
<br />throughaut the West," Millcr
<br />saicl.
<br />MiHcr said (edcral walcr
<br />righcs cvere 5c[ aside as the
<br />1,Vayne N. Aspinall Units in
<br />i956, flic same timc as C'lam-
<br />ing Gorge, G1cn Czinynn and
<br />olher+vater storage projects
<br />were eslablishrd by lhe Colo-
<br />rado River Storage Project.
<br />"Tltis ivater is not your
<br />normal Colorsdo watcr rights
<br />watcr," hliller explained. "'1'he
<br />Aspinall pooi is fedecal water
<br />rights cstabtished at the same
<br />time as Lake Powcll and lliese
<br />other fedcrai sloragc projects
<br />being dcvcloped in iygG. The
<br />Aspinall units were developed,
<br />but thcy have never been uscd
<br />as origiiially intendcd - Fur
<br />Colorada consuniptivc iuc."
<br />llie idea was lirst brought
<br />to the stace iii 1982. ln jgeG,
<br />htilter again presenCed his
<br />concepts to tlle stare.
<br />"1'hc problem is, the West
<br />Slopc adopced a not-onc•drop
<br />policy and we've lost Zn yenrs
<br />of rotential progress," Miller
<br />said.
<br />West Slope opposition has
<br />already begun to surface, even
<br />in the shor[ time since Miller's
<br />company presentcd a Whitc
<br />Paprr to the statc as wcli as
<br />the U.S, Jepartments of fnCC-
<br />rior, Agriculture and Energy
<br />April ty. Prupusals to crcalc
<br />wildcrness and roadless arcas
<br />have been presented that en-
<br />cumpnss the same region that
<br />caulcl be utilized for the Union
<br />1'arlc rescrvoir.
<br />"The Conitnental Divide
<br />has made us info two warring
<br />nations. IYs unEortunate, and
<br />iNs got to change," Millcr said.
<br />"We'ee goL a concept here that
<br />will ulcimatcly benefit Colo-
<br />rado ancl the entire Southwest
<br />staces region."
<br />Gunnison Valley
<br />opposifion
<br />1Zcp. Kathleen turry,
<br />District 61 in Gunnison, said
<br />she wished she could channel
<br />some of Mi11er's irnagination
<br />and eiiergy into something
<br />that coutd passibly work.
<br />"Pm sure wftiat {ie didn't
<br />rnencion to the Farmers along
<br />thc Souih Pla[[e was that he
<br />oizly has remnants of this prUj•
<br />ect left to work with," Curry
<br />said. "l le his taken his applica-
<br />tion to the water courts and
<br />has been denied and the Su-
<br />preme Courk rcturncd his casc
<br />to Lhe water courts wilhout
<br />action.
<br />"lie lias no watcr rigfits,"
<br />Curry said. "He lias a lot of vi-
<br />sion, but no watcr rights."
<br />Curry said Iiis claimcd Aspi-
<br />na11 connection is a wealc tink
<br />at best, using a footnote in a
<br />previous Suprcmc Court ruling
<br />which stated lhere could he
<br />240,000 acre-feet unaccounted
<br />for in the Aspina11) Unit.
<br />Curry explained thatwater
<br />is set aside to fi11 Lake Powell,
<br />which is Colorado's water
<br />bank in the event of a drouglit
<br />year and the Southwesrern
<br />states put out a call for lheir
<br />alloCted watcr as outlined in
<br />s[at'e compacts,
<br />"Thcre could be some
<br />watcr in wet ycars, bu[ we
<br />would run the risk of aggra-
<br />vaCing storage shoc[ages at
<br />Lake Powel(," Curry said. "This
<br />would oniy compficate and puY
<br />at risk the transmountain wa-
<br />ters, junior rights waters, that
<br />are used in Denver and other
<br />compacts.
<br />"Lake Poweil is our banl<
<br />account, our insurance policy
<br />and he wants to use that
<br />water For his project," Curry
<br />said. She asked, "IF there were
<br />anoUier transmountain coa-
<br />nection forwater to go ta the
<br />Front Range, who would get
<br />the water really - the farmcrs
<br />or the cities?"
<br />Weld County farmers
<br />continue their fight
<br />In the meantime, members
<br />of the Water Users Defense
<br />Committee, comprised of
<br />South Platte River valley farm-
<br />ers ancl produce growers, am
<br />hanging tlieir collectiv: hats
<br />on the govemor's task force.
<br />Delores hfartinel] pushcd
<br />the {ocal group to begin asking
<br />customers to sign peti[ions at
<br />the toca1 markets and inform-
<br />ing the public, one person at a
<br />time.
<br />8righ[on-area growcr Deb
<br />PaIizzi agrecd, reminding the
<br />group that the late efforts in
<br />the past le6isVative session
<br />needed fo be be[ter organized
<br />beFore next year's scssion.
<br />"We need to get our tes-
<br />timony organized as early as
<br />possible for this task (orce,"
<br />Palizzi said. The task (orce
<br />is expected to hold public
<br />hearings this summer and
<br />fall be(ore forming any policy
<br />change to be presented to the
<br />legislacure nexl spring.
<br />Behind the farmers and
<br />working for the group, at-
<br />torney John Meineger said,
<br />"Getting the f.egislature to
<br />actually do something for the
<br />2008 pumping season" is the
<br />graup's top priority.
<br />"We have to build the
<br />political infrastructure to
<br />svpport the task force recom-
<br />mendations and restore river
<br />management Yo something
<br />rcasonable. You've been work-
<br />ing under the concept that
<br />you expect the legisla tors to
<br />do the right thing. But they
<br />respond to political pressure,
<br />not the right thing," Arnald
<br />Gaod said,
<br />Realizing that most oF [heir
<br />customers are sympathetic to
<br />the farmers' plighC, the group
<br />will work to fiave petitions
<br />signed and ready to counter
<br />¦ see WATER
<br />poge SA
|