My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Memo from Task Force Advisors Outlining Proposed Recommendations
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Memo from Task Force Advisors Outlining Proposed Recommendations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:36:06 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 10:26:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8420.500
Description
South Platte River Basin Task Force Recommendations
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
8/24/2007
Author
Task Force Advisors
Title
Memo from Task Force Advisors Outlining Proposed Recommendations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Correspondence
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
adequate accounting to the Division Engineer concerning the source and availability of <br />the water to be used for prepayment and receive confirmation from the Division Engineer <br />that the prepayment water will in fact provide water such that users would receive water <br />they would have been entitled to absent the out-of-priority depletions. The user seeking to <br />prepay out-of-priority depletions is required to notify all parties on the substitute water <br />supply notification list of the proposed prepayment. <br />3. Another suggestion was to enact legislation that would allow the use of CBT water in <br />augmentation plans. (Currently, the use of CBT water is limited to SWSPs). Further <br />discussion with managers of Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District led to a new <br />proposed recommendation that might provide for the use of CBT water in more <br />circumstances but is not limited to CBT water. <br />A possible recommendation is to add to C.R.S. § 37-92-3081anguage along the <br />following: <br />Water users with decreed augmentation plans may obtain an SWSP without amending the <br />decreed augmentation plan and to supplement such augmentation plan under the <br />following circumstances. When water becomes available, a user may lease such water to <br />replace out-of-priority depletions if such replacement will replace such out-of-priority <br />depletions in time location and amount. The time location and amount of the out-of- <br />priority to be replaced shall be as determined in the decreed augmentation plan. Prior to <br />the lease of such water, the user shall provide adequate accounting to the Division <br />Engineer concerning the source and availability of the replacement water and receive <br />confirmation from the Division Engineer that the water will in fact provide water to the <br />users would have been entitled to water absent the out-of-priority depletions. The user <br />seeking to supplement an augmentation plan is required to notify all parties on the <br />substitute water supply notification list of the proposed prepayment. The current process <br />provided for in 308 shall apply to this type SWSP request. Such a SWSP may only be <br />used to replace out-of-priority depletions created by pumping prior to the entry of the <br />decreed augmentation plan. A user may only use fully consumable water from a <br />particular water source for a total of five years without filing for a new augmentation plan <br />or filing to amend a currently decreed plan for augmentation. If the source of water is not <br />fully consumable, no water may be used if the use of that water will create any return <br />flow obligations beyond five years. <br />4. Another suggestion was to enact legislation that would allow augmentation plans and <br />SWSPs to use 1974 as the beginning date for determining past pumping depletion <br />obligations. <br />A possible recommendation is to add to C.R.S. § 37-92-305 and 305 language along the <br />following (this language was generally taken from § 37-92-308(3)(c)(III)): <br />An augmentation plan approved by the court or substitute water supply plan approved by <br />the State Engineer shall require replacement of out-of-priority depletions that affect the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.