My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150073 Final Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
C150073 Final Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2010 3:33:07 PM
Creation date
4/23/2009 10:05:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150073
Contractor Name
Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District - Water Activity Enterprise
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
14
County
Pueblo
Bill Number
SB 01-157
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Feasibility Evaluation of the Arkansas Valley Pipeline <br />Water Works! Committee <br />June 2003 <br />Classes of Injection Wells <br />The EPA groups underground injection into five classes for regulatory control purposes. <br />Each class groups wells with similar functions and construction and operating features so that <br />technical requirements can be applied consistently to the class. Class I includes the <br />emplacement of hazardous and non-hazardous fluids (industrial and municipal wastes) into <br />isolated formations beneath the lowermost USDW. Because they may inject hazardous <br />waste, Class I wells are the most strictly regulated and are further regulated under the <br />Resource, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Class II includes injection of brines and <br />other fluids associated with oil and gas production; Class III encompasses injection of fluids <br />associated with solution mining of minerals; Class IV .addresses injection of hazardous or <br />radioactive wastes into or above a USDW and is banned unless authorized under other <br />Statutes for groundwater remediation. Class V includes all underground injection not <br />included in Classes I-IV. Class V wells inject non-hazardous fluids into or above a USDW <br />and are typically shallow, on-site disposal systems, such as floor and sink drains which <br />discharge directly or indirectly to ground water, dry wells, leach fields, and similar types of <br />drainage wells. Further information on EPA's UIC program can be found on EPA's UIC <br />website (http://www.epa.Gov/safewater/uic/rep&guid.html). <br />Specific Regulations for Class I Wells <br />EPA considers a well used for injection of RO reject wastewater as a Class I injection well. <br />Class I injection wells are regulated under Subpart B of 40 CFR, Chapter 1, Section 146. In <br />general, the regulations state that Class I wells shall be sited so that they inject into a <br />formation which is beneath the lower-most formation containing, within 0.25 mile of the well <br />bore, an underground source of drinking water. Class I wells shall be cased and cemented to <br />prevent movement of fluids into or between underground sources of drinking water, and <br />(unless injecting non-corrosive municipal waste) shall inject fluids through tubing with a <br />packer set immediately above the injection zone, or tubing with an approved fluid seal as an <br />alternative. The tubing, packer and fluid seal shall be designed for the expected service. In <br />addition, appropriate logs and other tests shall be conducted during the drilling and <br />construction of Class I wells and an accompanying report must be submitted. Also, at a <br />minimum, the fluid pressure, temperature and fracture pressure of the injection formation, as <br />well as other physical and chemical characteristics of the injection matrix and formation <br />fluids, must be determined. <br />Minimum operating requirements state that pressure at the wellhead shall not exceed a <br />maximum calculated to assure that pressure in the injection zone does not initiate new <br />fractures or propagate existing fractures, and that injection does not cause movement of <br />injection or formation fluids into an USDW. <br />41 <br />GEI Consultants, 1nC. 01284 03-06-30 Feasibility Evaluation Final <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.