My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJC02410
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
PROJC02410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2025 4:42:01 PM
Creation date
4/3/2009 12:01:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150288
Contractor Name
Deuel and Snyder Improvement Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Morgan
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Alte~natives Evaluated <br />A range of alternatives were considered including 1) don't build <br />the project, 2) rebuild the sand gate using a"waterman" style of <br />slide gate, 3) rebuild the sand gate using a conventional radial <br />style gate, and 4) replace 25 feet of the river diversion <br />structure with a new bladder gate system. <br />An evaluation of the alternatives follows: <br />l. Don't build the project: <br />If the project were not pursued, the DSIC would have to <br />continue operating the system like normal. The current <br />system of flushing sand is extremely dangerous to company <br />personnel but is still vital to the operation of the canal. <br />This alternative is not acceptable to the Company. <br />2. Rebuild the sand gate using a"waterman" style of slide <br />gate: <br />This alternative would consist of replacing a portion of the <br />river diversion with a five foot "waterman" slide gate. This <br />alternative would create a platform over top the rollover <br />wall allowing for the safe and efficient operation of the <br />gate. A slide gate of this size may require multiple <br />personnel to operate especially as the older it gets. The <br />cost of this alternative is approximately $80,000. <br />3. Rebuild the sand gate using a conventional radial style <br />gate: <br />This alternative would consist of replacing a portion of the <br />river diversion with a 5 foot wide radial gate. This <br />alternative would create a platform over top the rollover <br />wall allowing for the safe and efficient operation of the <br />gate. This alternative is identical to alternative #2 except <br />for the type of gate. A radial gate can be continually <br />operated by one individual over time. The cost of this <br />alternative is approximately $100,000. <br />4. Replace 25 feet of the river diversion structure with a <br />new bladder gate system: <br />This alternative would consist of replacing part of the <br />river diversion with a 25 foot section of inflatable bladder <br />Feasibility Study <br />Deuel & Snyder Improvement Company <br />River Sand Gate Structure <br />February 20o9 <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.